Cited by 820Insect Utilization and EffectsForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

Conversion of organic material by black soldier fly larvae: establishing optimal feeding rates

Diener, Stefan, Zurbrügg, Christian, Tockner, Klement·2009·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

Larvae of the black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens (Diptera: Stratiomyidae), are voracious feeders of organic material and may thus be used in simple engineered systems to reduce organic waste in low- and middle-income countries. Controlled feeding experiments with standard fodder were conducted to assess the optimum amount of organic waste to be added to a CORS system (Conversion of Organic Refuse by Saprophages). A daily feeding rate of 100 mg chicken feed (60% moisture content) per larva resulted in an optimum trade-off between material reduction efficiency (41.8%, SE 0.61) and biomass production (prepupal dry weight: 48.0 mg, SE 2.0). Applied to market waste and human faeces, this corresponds to a potential daily feeding capacity of 3—5 kg/m 2 and 6.5 kg/m 2 , respectively. In addition, H. illucens prepupae quality was assessed to determine their suitability to substitute fishmeal in animal feed production. The chitin-corrected crude protein content ranged from 28.2 to 42.5%, depending on the amount of food provided to the larvae. Based on our study, a waste processing unit could yield a daily prepupal biomass of 145 g (dry mass) per m 2 . We conclude that larvae of the black soldier fly are potentially capable of converting large amounts of organic waste into protein-rich biomass to substitute fishmeal, thereby contributing to sustainable aquaculture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x09103838

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diener, S., Zurbrügg, C., & Tockner, K.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH)
Corresponding author
Diener, Stefan
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2009-06-05
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
603-610
ISSN
  • 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3669
OpenAlex
W2128800094
Cited by
820
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 98 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Eawag (Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
Hermetia illucens, organic waste conversion, fishmeal substitution, aquaculture feed, chicken feed, human feces, market waste, protein content, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Feed, Diptera, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Larva, Male, Refuse Disposal, Aquaculture, Insect Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review