The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities
Open accessAbstract
This paper uses the ‘lens’ of integrated and sustainable waste management (ISWM) to analyse the new data set compiled on 20 cities in six continents for the UN-Habitat flagship publication Solid Waste Management in the World’s Cities. The comparative analysis looks first at waste generation rates and waste composition data. A process flow diagram is prepared for each city, as a powerful tool for representing the solid waste system as a whole in a comprehensive but concise way. Benchmark indicators are presented and compared for the three key physical components/drivers: public health and collection; environment and disposal; and resource recovery – and for three governance strategies required to deliver a well-functioning ISWM system: inclusivity; financial sustainability; and sound institutions and pro-active policies. Key insights include the variety and diversity of successful models – there is no ‘one size fits all’; the necessity of good, reliable data; the importance of focusing on governance as well as technology; and the need to build on the existing strengths of the city. An example of the latter is the critical role of the informal sector in the cities in many developing countries: it not only delivers recycling rates that are comparable with modern Western systems, but also saves the city authorities millions of dollars in avoided waste collection and disposal costs. This provides the opportunity for win–win solutions, so long as the related wider challenges can be addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
Waste and want : a social history of trash
Strasser, S. (1999) · Cited by 636
Development drivers for waste management
Wilson, D. C. (2007) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x07079149 · Cited by 474
Self-citationWaste: uncovering the global food scandal
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3773 · Cited by 406
Building recycling rates through the informal sector
Wilson, D. C., Araba, A. O., Chinwah, K., & Cheeseman, C. R. (2009) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.06.016 · Cited by 343
Self-citationState of the world's cities, 2008/2009: harmonious cities
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4749 · Cited by 313
Scavenger cooperatives in Asia and Latin America
Medina, M. (2000) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/s0921-3449(00)00071-9 · Cited by 293
What a waste : solid waste management in Asia
Hoornweg, D. T. (1999) · Cited by 257
Conceptual framework for municipal solid waste management in low-income countries
Schübeler, P., Wehrle, K., & Christen, J. (1996) · Cited by 200
Setting priorities for waste management strategies in developing countries
Brunner, P. H., & Fellner, J. (2007) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x07078296 · Cited by 188
Cited by
Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution
Lau, W. W. Y., Shiran, Y., Bailey, R. M., Cook, E., Stuchtey, M. R., Koskella, J., Velis, C. A., Godfrey, L., Boucher, J., Murphy, M. B., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aba9475 · Cited by 1,766
Self-citationThe food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020 · Cited by 1,711
Surendra, K. C., Tomberlin, J. K., van Huis, A., Cammack, J. A., Heckmann, L.-H. L., & Khanal, S. K. (2020) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.050 · Cited by 456
Aparcana, S. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.028 · Cited by 293
Integrated sustainable waste management in developing countries
Wilson, D. C., Velis, C. A., & Rodic, L. (2013) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management · doi:10.1680/warm.12.00005 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Scheinberg, A., Velis, C. A., & Alabaster, G.
- Venue
- Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-254
- ISSN
- 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
- 1096-3669
- OpenAlex
- W2097929497
- Cited by
- 490
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 47.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0734242x12437569
- The paper
- Wilson, D. C., Rodic, L., Scheinberg, A., Velis, C. A., & Alabaster, G. (2012). Comparative analysis of solid waste management in 20 cities. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x12437569
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.