Cited by 57Municipal Solid Waste ManagementWaste Management and Environmental ImpactHealthcare and Environmental Waste Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Waste-to-energy incineration plants as greenhouse gas reducers: A case study of seven Japanese metropolises

Tabata, Tomohiro·2013·Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration is a greenhouse gas (GHG) emitter; however, if GHG reductions, achieved by accounting for waste-to-energy, exceed GHG emissions, incineration can be considered as a net GHG reducer. In Japan, only 24.5% of MSW incineration plants perform energy recovery despite 80% of MSW being incinerated; therefore, there is great potential to extract more energy from MSW. In this study, the factors that should be considered to achieve net GHG reductions from incineration were analysed from a life cycle perspective. These considerations were then applied to the energy supply requirements in seven Japanese metropolises. Firstly, the carbon footprints of approximately 1500 incineration plants in Japan were calculated. Then, the incineration plants with negative carbon footprint values were classified as net GHG reducers. Next, the processes that contribute to the carbon footprint were evaluated, and two processes—plastic burning and electricity savings—were found to have the greatest influence. Based on the results, the energy supply requirements were analysed and discussed for seven metropolises (Sapporo, Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka, Kobe, Takamatsu and Fukuoka) taking into account the energy demands of households. In Kobe, 16.2% of the electricity demand and 25.0% of the hot water demand could be satisfied by incineration to realise a net GHG reducer, although urban design for energy utilisation would be required.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0734242x13502385

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. FEPC (ed.) (The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan), 2011, Handbook of Electric Power Companies
  2. JEMAI (ed.) (Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry) (2005) [JEMAI LCA Pro]. Available at: http://www.jemai.or.jp/CACHE/lca_details_lcaobj6.cfm (accessed 16 January 2013) [in Japanese].
  3. JWRF (ed.) (Japan Waste Research Foundation), 2003, Japanese Statistical Data Book on Operating Data of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plants in FY2001
  4. JWRF, 2005, Japanese Statistical Data Book on Operating Data of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plants in FY2003
  5. JWRF (ed.), 2008, Japanese Statistical Data Book on Operating Data of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Plants in FY2006
  6. Matsuto T, 2005, Analysis, Plan and evaluation of municipal solid Waste Management System
  7. MOE (ed.) (Ministry of Environment, Japan) (2002) [Report for calculation method of GHG emissions]. Available at: http://www.env.go.jp/earth/ondanka/santeiho/kento/h1408/index.html (accessed 16 January 2013) [in Japanese].
  8. MOE (ed.) (2011) [MSW treatment statistics in Japan]. Available at: http://www.env.go.jp/recycle/waste_tech/ippan/h21/index.html (accessed 16 January 2013) [in Japanese].
  9. Mushtaq M (2009) International Synergy and Strategy, DAKOFA/ISWA Waste and Climate Conference 2009. Available at: http://www.wasteandclimate.org/DocumentDownloadServlet?id=56 (accessed 16 January 2013)
  10. Sakakibara Y, 2000, Energy Economy, 26, 17
  11. SBDPP (ed.) (Statistics Bureau and the Director-General for Policy Planning of Japan) (2011) [2010 population census of Japan]. Available at: http://www.e-stat.go.jp/estat/html/NewList/000001039448/NewList-000001039448.html (accessed 16 January 2013) [in Japanese].
  12. Tabata T, 2009, Journal of Environmental Information Science, 37, 73
  13. Themelis NJ, 2011, Waste Management World, 12, 41
  14. WBCSD (ed.) (World Business Council for Sustainable Development) (2004) the greenhouse gas protocol - a corporate accounting and reporting standard (revised edition). Avaialable at: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/files/ghgp/public/ghg-protocol-revised.pdf (accessed 2 April 2013).
  15. Yang C, 2008, Journal of Japan Waste Management Association, 61, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 57

Metadata

Authors
Tabata, T.
Affiliations
Kobe University (JP)
Corresponding author
Tabata, Tomohiro
Venue
Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
Published
2013-09-11
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1110-1117
ISSN
  • 0734-242X (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3669
OpenAlex
W2134694617
Cited by
57
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waste Management & Research The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Keywords
municipal solid waste incineration, waste-to-energy, greenhouse gas emissions, carbon footprint, life cycle assessment, plastic burning, electricity saving, household energy demand, hot water demand
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Cities, Conservation of Energy Resources, Electricity, Gases, Japan, Models, Theoretical, Incineration, Greenhouse Effect, Carbon Footprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review