Cited by 90Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Changes in Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Across the 20- to 90-Year Age Range on the K-Bit

Wang, Jing-Jen, Kaufman, Alan S.·1993·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Abstract

Changes in ability across the adult life span were investigated for the adult portion of the K-BIT standardization sample (500 individuals aged 20 to 90 years) to permit comparisons with the results of similar investigations conducted with the WAIS and WAIS-R. These changes were explored for separate measures of crystallized intelligence (Vocabulary) and fluid intelligence (Matrices). Two two-way ANCOVAs (age and gender) were conducted, in which raw scores on Vocabulary and Matrices served as dependent variables and educational attainment as the covariate. Results agreed with previous findings on the Wechsler scales: Crystallized intelligence basically was maintained across the age range, while fluid intelligence peaked early and declined steadily despite the control for education. Age x gender interactions were nonsignificant. This study showed that fluid intelligence seems to decline with increasing age, even when the test is untimated and does not rely on visual-motor coordination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073428299301100104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Findings from Wechsler adult scales generalize to an array of IQ tests, whether comprehensive, brief, or group-administered.

    “Though a great majority of investigations have been conducted with Wechsler’s individually administered adult scales, the findings generalize to an array of IQ tests, whether comprehensive (e.g., Kaufman and Horn 1996) or brief (e.g., Wang and Kaufman 1993), or administered in group format (e.g., Schaie and Hofer 2001; Kaufman and Horn 1996).”

    From Cognitive Aging Revisited: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the WAIS-5 (2025) · cites this paper as Wang and Kaufman 1993

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, J.-J., & Kaufman, A. S.
Affiliations
  • American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, Mnnesota
  • University of Alabama (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
1993-03
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
29-37
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
OpenAlex
W2054307921
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, adult lifespan, age differences, vocabulary, matrices, educational attainment, gender differences, cognitive aging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review