CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyEducational and Psychological AssessmentsPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relevance of WISC-III Indicators for Assessment of Learning Disabilities

Daley, Christine E., Nagle, Richard J.·1996·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
DOI 10.1177/073428299601400401
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The reliable and accurate diagnosis of learning disabilities (LD) is a prevailing concern for school psychologists and educators. Research seeking specific LD markers has often focused on the identification of characteristic performance profiles on cognitive measures. This study analyzed the scores of 308 learning disabled students on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition (WISGIII). Variability indices, patterns of subtest strengths and weaknesses, and postulated profiles based on factor scores and recategorizations were examined in an attempt to identify useful diagnostic indicators. Factor scores were derived and clustered via a hierarchical group procedure in order to ascertain the presence of potential LD subgroups. Findings provide little support for the use of WISCIII subtest patterns in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073428299601400401

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. 10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.239 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1489::AID-JCLP2270400638>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  3. Prifitera, A., 1993, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment Monograph Series — Advances in Psychoeducational Assessment: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition
  4. U.S. Department of Education, 1994, Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
  5. 10.1002/1520-6807(197610)13:4<477::AID-PITS2310130426>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
  6. Wechsler, D., 1949, Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
  7. Wechsler, D., 1991, Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Related

Metadata

Authors
Daley, C. E., & Nagle, R. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Arkansas (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Daley, Christine E.
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1996-12
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
320-333
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
DOI
10.1177/073428299601400401
OpenAlex
W2018653527
Cited by
25
References
43
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
learning disabilities, WISC-III, diagnostic biomarkers, cognitive variability, factor scores, intelligence testing, school-based diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review