Cited by 30Psychometric Methodologies and TestingCognitive Abilities and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Construct Bias in the Differential Ability Scales? Confirmatory and Hierarchical Factor Structure across Three Ethnic Groups

Keith, Timothy Z., Quirk, Kimberly J., Schartzer, Cindy, Elliott, Colin D.·1999·Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment

Abstract

The Differential Ability Scales (DAS) is a relatively new and well-received measure of intelligence for children and youth ages 21/2 through 17. Although there is evidence to support the construct validity of the DAS, there is little evidence concerning construct bias in the DAS. The purpose of this research was to test for construct bias in the DAS for children from the three major ethnic groups, and across the entire age range of the DAS. We also sought to determine the nature of the constructs measured across these three groups. Both purposes were accomplished through hierarchical, multisample confirmatory factor analysis of DAS standardization data. The research also illustrates the use of this methodology to perform a comprehensive test of construct bias. Results suggest that the DAS measures the same constructs for all three ethnic groups across the four age levels studied; the DAS, therefore, shows no construct bias across groups. Furthermore, the hierarchical factor structure of the test is quite consistent with the DAS's actual structure, thus supporting the construct validity of the DAS. The DAS's Nonverbal reasoning cluster may be a good measure of fluid intelligence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/073428299901700305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Keith, T. Z., Quirk, K. J., Schartzer, C., & Elliott, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Alfred University (US)
  • Keystone Central School District
  • Stueben County Mental Health Center
  • American Guidance Service
Corresponding author
Keith, Timothy Z.
Venue
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
Published
1999-09
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
249-268
ISSN
  • 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-5144
OpenAlex
W2089947106
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Differential Ability Scales, construct bias, construct validity, hierarchical factor structure, ethnic groups, intelligence testing, nonverbal reasoning, fluid intelligence, children and adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review