Construct Bias in the Differential Ability Scales? Confirmatory and Hierarchical Factor Structure across Three Ethnic Groups
Abstract
The Differential Ability Scales (DAS) is a relatively new and well-received measure of intelligence for children and youth ages 21/2 through 17. Although there is evidence to support the construct validity of the DAS, there is little evidence concerning construct bias in the DAS. The purpose of this research was to test for construct bias in the DAS for children from the three major ethnic groups, and across the entire age range of the DAS. We also sought to determine the nature of the constructs measured across these three groups. Both purposes were accomplished through hierarchical, multisample confirmatory factor analysis of DAS standardization data. The research also illustrates the use of this methodology to perform a comprehensive test of construct bias. Results suggest that the DAS measures the same constructs for all three ethnic groups across the four age levels studied; the DAS, therefore, shows no construct bias across groups. Furthermore, the hierarchical factor structure of the test is quite consistent with the DAS's actual structure, thus supporting the construct validity of the DAS. The DAS's Nonverbal reasoning cluster may be a good measure of fluid intelligence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior studies that examined test bias across different population subgroups have generally found no gender or ethnic group bias.
“Despite much discussion and debate in the literature with regard to the fairness of test instruments, those studies that have looked at test bias across different population subgroups have generally found no gender or ethnic group bias (e.g., Edwards & Oakland, 2006;Keith 1999;Keith et al. 1999;Scheiber 2016a, b;Scheiber & Kaufman, 2015;Reynolds et al. 2015;Trundt 2013).”
From Is the Cattell–Horn–Carroll-based factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition (WISC-V) construct invariant for a representative sample of African–American, Hispanic, and Caucasian male and female students ages 6 to 16 years? (2016) · cites this paper as Keith et al. 1999
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bishop, S. L., Richler, J., & Lord, C. (2006) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297040600630288 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Bishop, S., Gahagan, S., & Lord, C. (2007) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01782.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Scheiber, C. (2016) · Journal of Pediatric Neuropsychology · doi:10.1007/s40817-016-0019-7 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Dombrowski, S. C., Watkins, M. W., McGill, R. J., Canivez, G. L., Holingue, C., Pritchard, A. E., & Jacobson, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment · doi:10.1177/0734282920954583 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Keith, T. Z., Quirk, K. J., Schartzer, C., & Elliott, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Alfred University (US)
- Keystone Central School District
- Stueben County Mental Health Center
- American Guidance Service
- Corresponding author
- Keith, Timothy Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 249-268
- ISSN
- 0734-2829 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-5144
- OpenAlex
- W2089947106
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Differential Ability Scales, construct bias, construct validity, hierarchical factor structure, ethnic groups, intelligence testing, nonverbal reasoning, fluid intelligence, children and adolescents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review