Composing Networks: Writing Practices on Mobile Devices
Abstract
This article is an investigation of composing practices through which people create networks with mobile phones. By looking through the lens of actor-network theory, the author portrays the networking activity of mobile phone users as translation, what Latour describes as an infralanguage to which different disciplinary perspectives can be appended. Given how much mobile phone use is information-based, the author describes how five people composed on mobile phones to create coordinated networks of professional and domestic activity. To arrive at this discussion, the author first considers the objectives of mobile networking, which include creating a sense of place and coordination within that space. The author then describes the findings of a case study of mobile phone users who build translational networks. The discussion focuses on the participants’ composing practices.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many qualitative studies in professional communication have started to examine post-bureaucratic work and its particular challenges for the field.
“In particular, many qualitative studies in professional communication have begun to explore post-bureaucratic work and its special challenges for professional communication (e.g., [13][36][50]).”
From Fourth-Generation Activity Theory: An Integrative Literature Review and Implications for Professional Communication (2019) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Working Alone Together: Coworking as Emergent Collaborative Activity
Spinuzzi, C. (2012) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651912444070 · Cited by 764 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spinuzzi, C., & Guile, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) · doi:10.1109/procomm.2019.00012 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Swarts, J.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Swarts, Jason
- ORCID
- Swarts, Jason
- Venue
- Written Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09-24
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-417
- ISSN
- 0741-0883 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8472
- OpenAlex
- W2523317227
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Written Communication (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- mobile devices, network composition, actor-network theory, translation, mobile networking, sense of place, coordination, mobile writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review