A Social-Interactive Model of Writing
Abstract
In this decade, writing researchers have shown increasing interest in the social aspects of written communication. This interest has largely been stimulated by interest in writing-across-the-curriculum programs and dialogue journal keeping, as well as such pressing issues as the relationships of process to text and to the social contexts of writing, and the problem of genre. This article outlines a social-interactive model of written communication, highlighting the writer's role in negotiations with readers in the medium of text. Formalist theories of text meaning (meaning is in the text) and idealist theories of meaning (meaning in the reader) are reviewed and challenged. In social-interactive theories of discourse, which are proposed as an alternative to formalist and idealist theories, meaning is said to be a social construct negotiated by writer and reader through the medium of text, which uniquely configures their respective purposes. In the process of communicating, writers and readers may be said to make various “moves,” which achieve progressive and sequential “states” of understanding between them. Writers make three essential kinds of moves: They (1) initiate and (2) sustain written discourse, which they accomplish by means of (3) text elaboration. The rules for writers' moves are spelled out in a fundamental axiom and seven corollaries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Researchers have investigated visual differentiation of suggestions, enabling users to distinguish their own writing from AI-generated content.
“Researchers have investigated visual differentiation of suggestions [8,92,121], enabling users to clearly distinguish between their own writing and AI-generated content.”
From Co-Writing with AI, on Human Terms: Aligning Research with User Demands Across the Writing Process (2025) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 225
- Authors
- NYSTRAND, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- NYSTRAND, MARTIN
- Venue
- Written Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 66-85
- ISSN
- 0741-0883 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8472
- OpenAlex
- W1980391823
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 129.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Written Communication (publishedVersion)
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Keywords
- text meaning, writing process, genre, writing across the curriculum, dialogue journals, text elaboration, semiotics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review