Cited by 225Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesLinguistics and Education ResearchLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

A Social-Interactive Model of Writing

NYSTRAND, MARTIN·1989·Written Communication

Abstract

In this decade, writing researchers have shown increasing interest in the social aspects of written communication. This interest has largely been stimulated by interest in writing-across-the-curriculum programs and dialogue journal keeping, as well as such pressing issues as the relationships of process to text and to the social contexts of writing, and the problem of genre. This article outlines a social-interactive model of written communication, highlighting the writer's role in negotiations with readers in the medium of text. Formalist theories of text meaning (meaning is in the text) and idealist theories of meaning (meaning in the reader) are reviewed and challenged. In social-interactive theories of discourse, which are proposed as an alternative to formalist and idealist theories, meaning is said to be a social construct negotiated by writer and reader through the medium of text, which uniquely configures their respective purposes. In the process of communicating, writers and readers may be said to make various “moves,” which achieve progressive and sequential “states” of understanding between them. Writers make three essential kinds of moves: They (1) initiate and (2) sustain written discourse, which they accomplish by means of (3) text elaboration. The rules for writers' moves are spelled out in a fundamental axiom and seven corollaries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0741088389006001005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Researchers have investigated visual differentiation of suggestions, enabling users to distinguish their own writing from AI-generated content.

    “Researchers have investigated visual differentiation of suggestions [8,92,121], enabling users to clearly distinguish between their own writing and AI-generated content.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 225

Authors
NYSTRAND, M.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
NYSTRAND, MARTIN
Venue
Written Communication
Published
1989-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
66-85
ISSN
  • 0741-0883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8472
OpenAlex
W1980391823
Cited by
225
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
129.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Written Communication (publishedVersion)
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Linguistics and Education Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
text meaning, writing process, genre, writing across the curriculum, dialogue journals, text elaboration, semiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review