The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention: A Review of the Literature
Abstract
This article reviews the research literature that describes children who are unresponsive to generally effective early literacy interventions. Studies were selected in which (a) children ranged from preschoolers to third graders and were at risk for reading disabilities, (b) treatments targeted early literacy, (c) outcomes reflected reading development, and (d) students' unresponsiveness to intervention was described. The literature review included a computer search of several databases, an ancestral search of relevant articles and books, and a manual search of 11 journals. Twenty-three studies were identified, 8 of which were designed primarily to identify characteristics of unresponsive students; the remaining 15 studies focused on treatment effectiveness but also identified and described unresponsive students. A majority of unresponsive students had phonological awareness deficits. Additional characteristics included phonological retrieval or encoding deficits, low verbal ability, behavior problems, and developmental delays. Finally, methodological issues are discussed that complicate comparisons of nonresponders across studies, and implications for future research are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods
McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290507100404 · Cited by 292
Self-citationCurrent Evidence on the Effects of Intensive Early Reading Interventions
Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K. J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219418775110 · Cited by 189
Why intensive interventions are necessary for students with severe reading difficulties
Vaughn, S., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2010) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20481 · Cited by 163
Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., Taub, G. E., & McGrew, K. S. (2007) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/1045-3830.22.2.200 · Cited by 92
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2015) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/0741932514558337 · Cited by 81
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D.
- Venue
- Remedial and Special Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 300-316
- ISSN
- 0741-9325 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4756
- OpenAlex
- W2107775470
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention: A Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/07419325020230050501
- The paper
- Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention: A Review of the Literature. Remedial and Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325020230050501
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.