The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs
Abstract
Native advertising is a new form of online advertising that appears in many settings, such as blogs, social media, and entertainment and news publications. Native ads typically blend with their surrounding context, stem from sources or placements that do not signal advertising, lack overtly persuasive or sales-focused messaging, and have less clear material outcomes. Such characteristics raise ethical concerns because native ads are more difficult for consumers to identify and because they challenge concepts that are central to current deceptive advertising policy. Native advertising is a Federal Trade Commission enforcement priority, and the agency has developed guidelines for this new ad form. However, the unique characteristics of native advertising likely require novel approaches to protect consumers. In this article, the authors trace the evolution of regulation relevant to native advertising. They identify shortcomings and propose remedies that the Federal Trade Commission or industry could adopt to prevent consumer harm, detect infractions, and enforce its regulations. The authors also develop an agenda for future research needed to more fully inform public policy and industry response in this arena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2000) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/314309 · Cited by 1,342
Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002 · Cited by 581
Good native advertising isn’t a secret
Campbell, C., & Marks, L. J. (2015) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.06.003 · Cited by 164
Self-citation
Cited by
When less is more: the impact of macro and micro social media influencers’ disclosure
Kay, S., Mulcahy, R., & Parkinson, J. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2020.1718740 · Cited by 508
Janssen, L., Schouten, A. P., & Croes, E. A. J. (2022) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2021.1994205 · Cited by 350
Service Research Priorities: Designing Sustainable Service Ecosystems
Field, J. M., Fotheringham, D., Subramony, M., Gustafsson, A., Ostrom, A. L., Lemon, K. N., Huang, M.-H., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2021) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705211031302 · Cited by 202
How social media influencers impact consumer collectives: an embeddedness perspective
Mardon, R., Cocker, H., & Daunt, K. (2023) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1093/jcr/ucad003 · Cited by 82
Balaban, D. C., Mucundorfeanu, M., & Naderer, B. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2024.2413916 · Cited by 11
“SMIs are digital content creators, opinion leaders, and strategic communication actors (Enke and Borchers 2019) that publish content in exchange for compensation (Campbell and Grimm 2019).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, C., & Grimm, P. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Public Policy & Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-19
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 110-123
- ISSN
- 0743-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7207
- OpenAlex
- W2909443471
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0743915618818576
- The paper
- Campbell, C., & Grimm, P. E. (2019). The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618818576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.