In-vivo data on the influence of tobacco smoke and UV light on murine skin
Abstract
Inhaled tobacco smoke comes in direct contact with few organs such as mouth, lungs, and stomach. Cigarette smoke (CS) in lungs has been extensively studied. However, limited data exist on its effect on skin, and there are no long-term experimental studies suggesting toxic effects on skin. Even though it is generally accepted that CS is among the main factors of skin aging, the number of experimental studies showing this aging effect is limited. We hereby studied the effect of long-term exposure to CS on the skin of hairless mice in combination with or without ultraviolet (UV) light. In addition, we investigated potential skin protection by a potent antioxidant namely procyanidine-rich French maritime pine bark extract (PBE) pycnogenol. Male and female hairless SKH-2 mice were exposed for 10 months to tobacco smoke and/or UV light in vivo, and their effects on skin were investigated. Some biophysical parameters such as development of erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin elasticity were measured. The results show that UV and CS may be acting synergistically, as shown by the enhanced TEWL, erythema values, epitheliomas, and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) observed, whereas PBE seems to protect skin against SCC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mouse skin, UVA exposure significantly increased the toxic impact of B[a]P or cigarette smoke, including the induction of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
“In mouse skin, UVA exposure significantly increased the toxic impact of B[a]P54 or cigarette smoke,55 including the induction of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).55”
From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [55]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 37
- Authors
- Pavlou, P., Rallis, M., Deliconstantinos, G., Papaioannou, G., & Grando, S.
- Affiliations
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rallis, M
- Venue
- Toxicology and Industrial Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 231-239
- ISSN
- 0748-2337 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0393
- OpenAlex
- W2106011304
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Toxicology and Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- cigarette smoke, ultraviolet radiation, skin aging, skin carcinogenesis, squamous cell carcinoma, epithelioma, transepidermal water loss, skin elasticity, erythema, Pycnogenol, maritime pine bark extract, procyanidins, synergistic effect, hairless mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antioxidants, Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Elasticity, Erythema, Female, Flavonoids, Male, Melanins, Mice, Hairless, Plant Extracts, Sex Factors, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Time Factors, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Ultraviolet Rays, Water Loss, Insensible, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review