Cited by 37Skin Protection and AgingSmoking Behavior and CessationNonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies

In-vivo data on the influence of tobacco smoke and UV light on murine skin

Pavlou, P, Rallis, M, Deliconstantinos, G, Papaioannou, G, Grando, SA·2009·Toxicology and Industrial Health

Abstract

Inhaled tobacco smoke comes in direct contact with few organs such as mouth, lungs, and stomach. Cigarette smoke (CS) in lungs has been extensively studied. However, limited data exist on its effect on skin, and there are no long-term experimental studies suggesting toxic effects on skin. Even though it is generally accepted that CS is among the main factors of skin aging, the number of experimental studies showing this aging effect is limited. We hereby studied the effect of long-term exposure to CS on the skin of hairless mice in combination with or without ultraviolet (UV) light. In addition, we investigated potential skin protection by a potent antioxidant namely procyanidine-rich French maritime pine bark extract (PBE) pycnogenol. Male and female hairless SKH-2 mice were exposed for 10 months to tobacco smoke and/or UV light in vivo, and their effects on skin were investigated. Some biophysical parameters such as development of erythema, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), and skin elasticity were measured. The results show that UV and CS may be acting synergistically, as shown by the enhanced TEWL, erythema values, epitheliomas, and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) observed, whereas PBE seems to protect skin against SCC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0748233709103209

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mouse skin, UVA exposure significantly increased the toxic impact of B[a]P or cigarette smoke, including the induction of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

    “In mouse skin, UVA exposure significantly increased the toxic impact of B[a]P54 or cigarette smoke,55 including the induction of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).55”

    From The impact of airborne pollution on skin (2019) · cites this paper as [55]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 37

Authors
Pavlou, P., Rallis, M., Deliconstantinos, G., Papaioannou, G., & Grando, S.
Affiliations
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Rallis, M
Venue
Toxicology and Industrial Health
Published
2009-05
Volume
25
Issue
4-5
Pages
231-239
ISSN
  • 0748-2337 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0393
OpenAlex
W2106011304
Cited by
37
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology and Industrial Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Keywords
cigarette smoke, ultraviolet radiation, skin aging, skin carcinogenesis, squamous cell carcinoma, epithelioma, transepidermal water loss, skin elasticity, erythema, Pycnogenol, maritime pine bark extract, procyanidins, synergistic effect, hairless mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Antioxidants, Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Elasticity, Erythema, Female, Flavonoids, Male, Melanins, Mice, Hairless, Plant Extracts, Sex Factors, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Time Factors, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Ultraviolet Rays, Water Loss, Insensible, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review