CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Impact of tannery effluents on the aquatic environment of the Buriganga River in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Asaduzzaman, Mohammad, Hasan, Imtiaj, Rajia, Sultana, Khan, Nazneen, Kabir, Kazi Ahmed·2016·Toxicology and Industrial Health
DOI 10.1177/0748233714548206
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study presents an overview of the existence and effects of six heavy metals, chromium (Cr), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), and aluminum (Al), in tannery effluents released to the Buriganga River in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The pollutants were found in three different sources, such as effluents from tanneries, contaminated river water and three species of fish—climbing perch ( Anabas testudineus), spotted snakehead ( Channa punctata), and Black tilapia ( Oreochromis mossambicus) caught from the river. Tannery effluents, water, and fish samples were collected from three different factories, five sample stations, and three different harvesting points, respectively. Effluents from all three factories contained significant amounts of heavy metals, especially Cr (374.19 ppm in average), whereas lesser amounts were found in the tissues of the three fish species studied. The trends in tissue elemental concentrations of fish were Cr > Pb > Al > Hg > Mn > Cd. In most cases (Cr, Cd, Mn, and Al), heavy metal concentrations were found to be greater in climbing perch than in Black tilapia and spotted snakehead. Although the river water contained high concentrations of harmful heavy metals, the fish species under study had concentrations well below the permissible Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization levels for those metals and seemed to be safe for human consumption.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0748233714548206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The concentration of chromium in tannery effluent determined in our study (0.002 mg/L to 1.85 × 10 mg/L) was significantly lower than that of another study (5.25 × 10 mg/L to 3.74 × 102 mg/L) conducted in the same tannery industrial area but different tanneries.

    “However, the concentration of chromium in tannery effluent determined in our study was significantly lower (ranging from 0.002 mg/L to 1.85 × 10 mg/L) than that of another study (ranging from 5.25 × 10 mg/L to 3.74 × 102 mg/L) conducted in the same tannery industrial area but comprised of different tanneries55.”

    From Impact of untreated tannery wastewater in the evolution of multidrug-resistant bacteria in Bangladesh (2024) · cites this paper as [55]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. 10.1016/0043-1354(84)90111-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF03325936 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/02757540.2013.810728 · DOI
  4. Ambedkar G, 2011, Archives of Applied Science Research, 3, 261
  5. 10.1081/ESE-200048297 · DOI
  6. APHA, AWWA, and WPCF, 1998, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste Water
  7. Buljan J, 1996, World Leather, 9, 6568
  8. 10.1006/enrs.1998.3930 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.biortech.2003.12.001 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/es60065a006 · DOI
  11. Deepali KKG, 2010, New York Science Journal, 3, 82
  12. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.02.018 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/02757549308035985 · DOI
  14. FAO (1983) Compilation of Legal Limits for Hazardous Substance in Fish and Fishery Products. FAO Fishery circular no. 464. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, pp. 5–100.
  15. FAO/WHO, 1990, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission
  16. 10.1007/978-3-642-69385-4 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00773-7 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/eesa.1995.1080 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00086-3 · DOI
  20. Gomez AK, 1984, Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research
  21. Haffor SA, 2003, Journal of Environmental Biology, 24, 271
  22. Haque W, 2003, Bangladesh Journal of Zoology, 31, 247
  23. Hasan I, 2009, Global Journal of Environmental Research, 3, 218
  24. 10.1016/0048-9697(96)05110-8 · DOI
  25. Huq SMI, 1998, Proceedings of a workshop held at the Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
  26. Ipinmoroti KO, 1997, Journal of Techno-Science, 1, 46
  27. 10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00484-X · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0048-9697(97)00232-5 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10661-008-0693-8 · DOI
  30. Nsikak UB, 2007, Current Science, 92, 781
  31. 10.15228/2013.v03.i01.p05 · DOI
  32. 10.1504/IJEP.2006.010881 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s10653-004-7980-2 · DOI
  34. Sharif AKM, Alamgir M, Bajue SA (2009a) Levels of lead and cadmium in 17 species of fresh water fish of Bangladesh. Journal of National Oceanographic, Atmospheric and Marine Institute 26(2): 1–7. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/malamgir46/levels-of-lead-and-cadmium-in-17-species-of-fresh-water-fish-of-bangladesh
  35. Sharif AKM, Alamgir M, Bajue SA (2009b) Mercury concentrations in 14 commonly consumed fresh water fish of Bangladesh, Journal of National Oceanographic, Atmospheric and Marine Institute 26(1): 1–7. Available at: http://content.yudu.com/Library/A1pdou/MERCURYCONCENTRATION/resources/index.htm?referrerUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.co.jp%2Furl%3Fsa%3Dt%26rct%3Dj%26q%3D%26esrc%3Ds%26source%3Dweb%26cd%3D2%26ved%3D0CCQQFjAB%26url%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fcontent.yudu.com%252FLibrary%252FA1pdou%252FMERCURYCONCENTRATION%252F%26ei%3D2JD3U-OUE9Ld8AXBzYII%26usg%3DAFQjCNF_gApl1FZApTQO5crQNe7g-MDDaQ.
  36. 10.1080/02772240902830755 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0748233709345941 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.08.023 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0025-326X(93)90504-D · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.05.009 · DOI
  41. Wetzel RG, Likens GE (2006) Limnological Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Springer, p. 391.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Asaduzzaman, M., Hasan, I., Rajia, S., Khan, N., & Kabir, K. A.
Venue
Toxicology and Industrial Health
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2014-09-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1106-1113
ISSN
  • 0748-2337
  • 1477-0393
DOI
10.1177/0748233714548206
Cited by
29
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review