Care Considerations in a Patient- and Family-Centered Medical Assistance in Dying Program
Abstract
Objective: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in June 2016. As part of a project designed to improve end-of-life care for those requesting MAID, qualitative data from patients, families, and providers were used to assess opportunities to enhance patient-and family-centered care (PFCC) in this program. Methods: Thirty interviews were conducted with patients, families, and healthcare providers. Five patients who requested an assessment for MAID, 11 family members, and 14 healthcare providers were interviewed about their experiences in 2017. Comparative coding and thematic analysis were completed with the support of NVivo12. Results: Emotional PFCC considerations included: exploring and validating the emotional journey, navigating the uncertain, judgmental experiences, and the emotional impact on families and the care team. Physical PFCC considerations included: sensitivity in eligibility assessments, weaving in interdisciplinary care, provision of anticipatory guidance, and death location. Spiritual PFCC considerations included: honoring choice, listening to life stories, supporting spiritual needs, and acknowledging loss. Relational PFCC considerations included: defining the circle of support, supporting the circle, and relational investments. Conclusion: Fundamental to a PFCC MAID program, practitioners must be afforded time to provide holistic care. Program-related suggestions include incorporating interdisciplinary care early, and throughout the illness trajectory, consistency in care providers, appropriate anticipatory guidance, and bereavement supports for family, and dedicate space for MAID provisions. Patients and families must be included in the ongoing development and re-evaluation of MAID programs to ensure continued focus on quality end-of-life care.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies highlight the need for holistic, interdisciplinary care, relationship building and anticipatory guidance throughout the process, as well as bereavement supports for family and loved ones, and dedicated space for MAiD provision.
“Recent studies have also highlighted the need for holistic, interdisciplinary care, relationship building and anticipatory guidance throughout the process, as well as bereavement supports for family and loved ones, and dedicated space for MAiD provision [25–27].”
Participants stressed the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary assessments, and the opportunity to tell their story and exercise autonomous health decision making.
“Similarly, in keeping with prior research with patients with other health conditions and their families, participants stressed the importance of holistic, interdisciplinary assessments, and the opportunity to tell their story and exercise autonomous health decision making [25, 49].”
These perspectives support and are supported by prior research calling for MAiD care coordination, inter-professional approaches, and attention to applicants' and families' emotional, social and spiritual needs.
“These perspectives support and are supported by prior research calling for MAiD care coordination, inter-professional approaches, and attention to applicants’ and families’ emotional, social and spiritual needs, among others [24, 25, 50–52].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 38
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [1]1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century . National Academies Press (US); 2001. Accessed May 21, 2019. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/
- [12]12. Petitpas Taylor G. Regulations for the Monitoring of Medical Assistance in Dying: SOR/2018-166. Can Gaz . 2018;152(16):3069-3099.
- [14]14. Frolic A, Swinton M, Murray L, Oliphant A, Miller P. MAID to Last: Creating Sustainable Interprofessional Teams to Provide High-Quality Medical Assistance in Dying . Hambilton Health Sciences; 2018:1-57.
- [15]15. Shaw J, Wiebe E, Nuhn A, Holmes S, Kelly M, Just A. Providing medical assistance in dying: Practice perspectives. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can . 2018;64(9):e394-e399.
- [31]31. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research . 1st ed. Sage Publications; 1994:105-117.
- [48]48. Butcher H, Bulechek G, McCloskey Dochterman J, Wagner C. Nursing Interventions Classification Elsevier Ebook on Vitalsource. Mosby Inc; 2018.
- Authors
- Brown, J., Goodridge, D., Harrison, A., Kemp, J., Thorpe, L., & Weiler, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Regina (CA)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Saskatchewan Health Authority (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Janine
- Venue
- Journal of Palliative Care
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-08-28
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-351
- ISSN
- 0825-8597 (ISSN-L)
- 2369-5293
- OpenAlex
- W3082662121
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 2.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- oURspace (University of Regina) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- medical assistance in dying, patient- and family-centered care, end-of-life care, palliative care, anticipatory guidance, multidisciplinary care, bereavement support, spiritual care, family caregivers, eligibility determination, holistic care
- MeSH terms
- Canada, Family, Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Assistance, Terminal Care, Hospice Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review