Cited by 38Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Care Considerations in a Patient- and Family-Centered Medical Assistance in Dying Program

Brown, Janine, Goodridge, Donna, Harrison, Averi, Kemp, Jordan, Thorpe, Lilian, Weiler, Robert·2022·Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract

Objective: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in June 2016. As part of a project designed to improve end-of-life care for those requesting MAID, qualitative data from patients, families, and providers were used to assess opportunities to enhance patient-and family-centered care (PFCC) in this program. Methods: Thirty interviews were conducted with patients, families, and healthcare providers. Five patients who requested an assessment for MAID, 11 family members, and 14 healthcare providers were interviewed about their experiences in 2017. Comparative coding and thematic analysis were completed with the support of NVivo12. Results: Emotional PFCC considerations included: exploring and validating the emotional journey, navigating the uncertain, judgmental experiences, and the emotional impact on families and the care team. Physical PFCC considerations included: sensitivity in eligibility assessments, weaving in interdisciplinary care, provision of anticipatory guidance, and death location. Spiritual PFCC considerations included: honoring choice, listening to life stories, supporting spiritual needs, and acknowledging loss. Relational PFCC considerations included: defining the circle of support, supporting the circle, and relational investments. Conclusion: Fundamental to a PFCC MAID program, practitioners must be afforded time to provide holistic care. Program-related suggestions include incorporating interdisciplinary care early, and throughout the illness trajectory, consistency in care providers, appropriate anticipatory guidance, and bereavement supports for family, and dedicate space for MAID provisions. Patients and families must be included in the ongoing development and re-evaluation of MAID programs to ensure continued focus on quality end-of-life care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0825859720951661

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 38

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century . National Academies Press (US); 2001. Accessed May 21, 2019. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK222274/
  2. [12]12. Petitpas Taylor G. Regulations for the Monitoring of Medical Assistance in Dying: SOR/2018-166. Can Gaz . 2018;152(16):3069-3099.
  3. [14]14. Frolic A, Swinton M, Murray L, Oliphant A, Miller P. MAID to Last: Creating Sustainable Interprofessional Teams to Provide High-Quality Medical Assistance in Dying . Hambilton Health Sciences; 2018:1-57.
  4. [15]15. Shaw J, Wiebe E, Nuhn A, Holmes S, Kelly M, Just A. Providing medical assistance in dying: Practice perspectives. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can . 2018;64(9):e394-e399.
  5. [31]31. Guba E, Lincoln Y. Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, eds. Handbook of Qualitative Research . 1st ed. Sage Publications; 1994:105-117.
  6. [48]48. Butcher H, Bulechek G, McCloskey Dochterman J, Wagner C. Nursing Interventions Classification Elsevier Ebook on Vitalsource. Mosby Inc; 2018.

Authors
Brown, J., Goodridge, D., Harrison, A., Kemp, J., Thorpe, L., & Weiler, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Regina (CA)
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Saskatchewan Health Authority (CA)
Corresponding author
Brown, Janine
Venue
Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
341-351
ISSN
  • 0825-8597 (ISSN-L)
  • 2369-5293
OpenAlex
W3082662121
Cited by
38
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • oURspace (University of Regina) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
medical assistance in dying, patient- and family-centered care, end-of-life care, palliative care, anticipatory guidance, multidisciplinary care, bereavement support, spiritual care, family caregivers, eligibility determination, holistic care
MeSH terms
Canada, Family, Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Assistance, Terminal Care, Hospice Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review