Cited by 68Probiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Probiotics Reduce the Risk of Antibiotic‐Associated Diarrhea in Adults (18–64 Years) but Not the Elderly (>65 Years): A Meta‐Analysis

Jafarnejad, Sadegh, Shab‐Bidar, Sakineh, Speakman, John R., Parastui, Karim, Daneshi‐Maskooni, Milad, Djafarian, Kurosh·2016·Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background: Antibiotic‐associated diarrhea (AAD) is a common problem in adults and elderly patients due to the widespread use of antibiotics in this population. Multiple previous systematic reviews have demonstrated an association between specific probiotics and decrease of AAD, especially in children. As there is no specific analysis concerning the elderly patients, we decided to focus on adults, especially elderly people. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature regarding the use of probiotics in the treatment of AAD in adults (18–64 years old) and elderly subjects (≥65 years old). We identified 436 articles that met the search criteria. Thirty randomized controlled trials met the predefined inclusion criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. Results: There was considerable heterogeneity among the trials (P < .001); thus, subgroup analyses were performed. The meta‐analysis resulted in a pooled relative risk (RR) of AAD of 0.69 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.62–0.76) in a fixed effects model and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.48–0.71) in a random effects model, as compared with placebo. The positive association between intake of probiotic and reduced risk of AAD was observed in adults (RR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.4–0.56). In contrast, in elderly patients, there was no positive effect (RR, 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76–1.15) of probiotic use and AAD. Conclusion: In summary, the results emerging from our meta‐analysis suggested that adjunct probiotic administration is associated with a reduced risk of AAD in adults but not in elderly people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0884533616639399

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 68

Authors
Jafarnejad, S., Shab‐Bidar, S., Speakman, J. R., Parastui, K., Daneshi‐Maskooni, M., & Djafarian, K.
Affiliations
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Djafarian, Kurosh
Venue
Nutrition in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-04-29
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
502-513
ISSN
  • 0884-5336 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2452
OpenAlex
W2344126171
Cited by
68
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
probiotics, antibiotic-associated diarrhea, elderly patients, adults, antibiotic adverse effects, subgroup analysis, probiotic supplementation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Diarrhea, Humans, Middle Aged, Risk, Probiotics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review