Cited by 37Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSocial Work Education and PracticeGender and Feminist Studies

Invisible Practices: Interventions With Men Who Use Violence and Control

Open access
Heward-Belle, Susan, Humphreys, Cathy, Healey, Lucy, Toivonen, Cherie, Tsantefski, Menka·2019·Affilia

Abstract

Data from this article are derived from responses to questionnaires provided by 232 frontline workers and team leaders from a range of organizations across four Australian states who participated in The Invisible Practices Project: Engaging With Fathers Who Use Violence. This project was designed to explore the practices of workers who see perpetrators of domestic violence outside the relative safety of group-work programs. Thematic analysis was employed to examine the research question: What is the organizational context that contributes to, or constrains, the practices of frontline workers intervening with fathers who use violence? This article reports the ways that agencies increase the visibility of, and practices with, fathers who use violence. Increasing the visibility of fathers who use violence is posited as a crucial driver of policy and practice reform aligned with feminist goals of eliminating sexist institutional practices. It is argued that such practices render fathers who use violence invisible, reinforce patriarchal views of family roles and responsibilities, intensify the scrutiny on the mothering of women survivors, and compound the impact of domestic violence. This article documents emerging practices that seek to redress practices that support patriarchal views of family roles and responsibilities and has implications for understanding the capacity of social workers and other professionals to intervene with fathers who use violence.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886109919848750

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Heward-Belle, S., Humphreys, C., Healey, L., Toivonen, C., & Tsantefski, M.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Heward-Belle, Susan
Venue
Affilia
Published
2019-06-11
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
369-382
ISSN
  • 0886-1099 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3020
OpenAlex
W2952461423
Cited by
37
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Affilia (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ANROWS Australia’s National Research Organisation on Women’s Safety (PI.17.06)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
domestic violence, frontline workers, organizational context, social work intervention, women survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review