Adult Attachment as a Risk Factor for Intimate Partner Violence: The “Mispairing” of Partners' Attachment Styles
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between intimate partner violence and adult attachment in a sample of 70 couples. The attachment style of each partner and the interaction of the partners' attachment styles were examined as predictors of intimate partner violence. Additional analyses were conducted to examine violence reciprocity and to explore differences in the relationship between attachment and violence using continuous and dichotomous violence measures. Results of hierarchical regression analyses indicated the "mispairing" of an avoidant male partner with an anxious female partner was associated with both male and female violence. When controlling for partner violence, the relationship between attachment and violence was significant for males only. In addition, analyses using a dichotomized violence variable produced different results from analyses using a continuous violence measure. Clinical implications include focusing on the discrepancy between partners' needs for intimacy and distance within the couple as a strategy for treating intimate partner violence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerning physical IPV and partner's attachment, the dismissing-anxious couple pattern seems to foster physical violence in the couple, even in adolescents.
“Concerning physical IPV and partner's attachment, the dismissing-anxious couple pattern seems to foster physical violence in the couple (Rogers et al., 2005; Doumas et al., 2008), even in adolescents (Miga et al., 2010).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Doumas et al., 2008
Other studies claimed that a partner presenting high rates of anxiety tends to foster physical IPV perpetration by the other partner or even by themselves.
“Other studies claimed that partner presenting high rates of anxiety tend to foster physical IPV perpetration by the other partner (Doumas et al., 2008; Rapoza and Baker, 2008; Seiffge-Krenke and Burk, 2015) or even by themselves (Péloquin et al., 2011).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as Doumas et al., 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 184
- Authors
- Doumas, D. M., Pearson, C. L., Elgin, J. E., & McKinley, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Boise State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Doumas, Diana M.
- ORCID
- Doumas, Diana M.
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02-13
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 616-634
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W2114874364
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- adult attachment, intimate partner violence, attachment styles, mispairing, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, gender differences in violence, couples, intimacy and distance
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aggression, Anxiety, Courtship, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Object Attachment, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Sexual Partners, Domestic Violence, Crime Victims, Heterosexuality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review