Cited by 128Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceCrime Patterns and InterventionsSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The Association Between Impulsivity, Trait Anger, and the Perpetration of Intimate Partner and General Violence Among Women Arrested for Domestic Violence

Shorey, Ryan C., Brasfield, Hope, Febres, Jeniimarie, Stuart, Gregory L.·2011·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The problem of domestic violence is widespread, with research indicating men and women both perpetrate a substantial amount of aggression. However, aggression perpetrated by women is a relatively understudied area compared to aggression perpetrated by men. Additionally, research is needed to determine the correlates of aggression perpetration among women, as this can inform more effective treatment programs. Thus, the current study sought to examine the association between trait anger and impulsivity and the perpetration of physical and psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) and general aggression among women arrested for domestic violence ( N = 80). Findings indicated that both trait anger and impulsivity were significantly associated with aggression perpetration and trait anger mediated the relationship between impulsivity and aggression perpetration. Directions for future research and violence intervention programs are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260510388289

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 128

Authors
Shorey, R. C., Brasfield, H., Febres, J., & Stuart, G. L.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Shorey, Ryan C.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2010-11-30
Volume
26
Issue
13
Pages
2681-2697
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2123613288
Cited by
128
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016315)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
impulsivity, trait anger, intimate partner violence, women offenders, domestic violence, physical violence, psychological violence, mediation, arrest records, violence intervention programs
MeSH terms
Adult, Aggression, Anger, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Prisoners, Self Concept, Sexual Partners, Spouse Abuse, Young Adult, Criminals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review