To Tell or Not to Tell? Factors Influencing Young People’s Informal Disclosures of Child Sexual Abuse
Abstract
The aim was to understand the factors influencing informal disclosure of child sexual abuse experiences, taking account of dynamics operating prior to, during, and following disclosure. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 young people who experienced child sexual abuse and 14 parents. Grounded theory methodology informed the study. The key factors identified as influencing the disclosure process included being believed, being asked, shame/self-blame, concern for self and others, and peer influence. Many young people both wanted to tell and did not want to tell. Fear of not being believed; being asked questions about their well-being; feeling ashamed of what happened and blaming themselves for the abuse, for not telling, and for the consequences of disclosure; concern for how both disclosure and nondisclosure would impact on themselves and others; and being supported by and yet pressurized by peers to tell an adult, all illustrate the complex intrapersonal and interpersonal dynamics reflecting the conflict inherent in the disclosure process. These findings build on previous studies that emphasize the dialogic and interpersonal dynamics in the disclosure process. Both intrapersonal and interpersonal influencing factors need to be taken account of in designing interventions aimed at helping children tell. The importance of asking young people about their psychological well-being and the role of peer relationships are highlighted as key to how we can help young people tell.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peer influence plays a role in adolescents' disclosure processes.
“Lastly, participants agreed more with reporting of similar experiences by others as a reason for peer disclosure than for adult disclosure, highlighting the role of peer influence in adolescents’ disclosure processes (McElvaney et al., 2014).”
From Why They Speak Up (or Don’t): Reasons For and Against Cybergrooming Disclosure Among Adolescent Victims (2025) · cites this paper as McElvaney et al., 2014
Third-party reports might be biased as some victims of sexual victimization do not confide in others for reasons such as shame and fear of disbelief.
“Third-party reports might be biased as some victims of sexual victimization do not confide in others for various reasons, such as shame and fear of disbelief (McElvaney et al., 2014), leaving others unaware of the victimization due to non-disclosure.”
From Cybergrooming Victimization Among Young People: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Rates, Risk Factors, and Outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as McElvaney et al., 2014
Younger children who disclose are more likely to do so in an interview situation or other environment that provides prompts or questions about sexual abuse, and this trend can also be seen in older youth.
“Third, younger children who disclose are more likely to do so in an interview situation or other environment that provides prompts or questions about sexual abuse”
From Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Disclosures: A Research Update (2000–2016) (2019) · cites this paper as McElvaney, Greene, & Hogan, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 201
- Authors
- McElvaney, R., Greene, S., & Hogan, D.
- Affiliations
- Dublin City University (IE)
- Trinity College Dublin (IE)
- ORCID
- McElvaney, Rosaleen
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-11-27
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 928-947
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W2088667926
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 12.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
- Keywords
- child sexual abuse, disclosure, non-disclosure, youth, shame, self-blame, peer influence, perceived support, psychological well-being, parents, disclosure interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Disclosure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review