Cited by 201Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

To Tell or Not to Tell? Factors Influencing Young People’s Informal Disclosures of Child Sexual Abuse

McElvaney, Rosaleen, Greene, Sheila, Hogan, Diane·2014·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

The aim was to understand the factors influencing informal disclosure of child sexual abuse experiences, taking account of dynamics operating prior to, during, and following disclosure. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 young people who experienced child sexual abuse and 14 parents. Grounded theory methodology informed the study. The key factors identified as influencing the disclosure process included being believed, being asked, shame/self-blame, concern for self and others, and peer influence. Many young people both wanted to tell and did not want to tell. Fear of not being believed; being asked questions about their well-being; feeling ashamed of what happened and blaming themselves for the abuse, for not telling, and for the consequences of disclosure; concern for how both disclosure and nondisclosure would impact on themselves and others; and being supported by and yet pressurized by peers to tell an adult, all illustrate the complex intrapersonal and interpersonal dynamics reflecting the conflict inherent in the disclosure process. These findings build on previous studies that emphasize the dialogic and interpersonal dynamics in the disclosure process. Both intrapersonal and interpersonal influencing factors need to be taken account of in designing interventions aimed at helping children tell. The importance of asking young people about their psychological well-being and the role of peer relationships are highlighted as key to how we can help young people tell.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260513506281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peer influence plays a role in adolescents' disclosure processes.

    “Lastly, participants agreed more with reporting of similar experiences by others as a reason for peer disclosure than for adult disclosure, highlighting the role of peer influence in adolescents’ disclosure processes (McElvaney et al., 2014).”
  • Third-party reports might be biased as some victims of sexual victimization do not confide in others for reasons such as shame and fear of disbelief.

    “Third-party reports might be biased as some victims of sexual victimization do not confide in others for various reasons, such as shame and fear of disbelief (McElvaney et al., 2014), leaving others unaware of the victimization due to non-disclosure.”
  • Younger children who disclose are more likely to do so in an interview situation or other environment that provides prompts or questions about sexual abuse, and this trend can also be seen in older youth.

    “Third, younger children who disclose are more likely to do so in an interview situation or other environment that provides prompts or questions about sexual abuse”

    From Facilitators and Barriers to Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) Disclosures: A Research Update (2000–2016) (2019) · cites this paper as McElvaney, Greene, & Hogan, 2014

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 38 · Cited by 201

Authors
McElvaney, R., Greene, S., & Hogan, D.
Affiliations
  • Dublin City University (IE)
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
928-947
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2088667926
Cited by
201
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, disclosure, non-disclosure, youth, shame, self-blame, peer influence, perceived support, psychological well-being, parents, disclosure interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review