Cited by 85Child Abuse and TraumaIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Abuse Characteristics and Individual Differences Related to Disclosing Childhood Sexual, Physical, and Emotional Abuse and Witnessed Domestic Violence

Bottoms, Bette L., Peter-Hagene, Liana C., Epstein, Michelle A., Wiley, Tisha R. A., Reynolds, Carrie E., Rudnicki, Aaron G.·2016·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Many adult survivors of childhood abuse hide their victimization, avoiding disclosure that could identify perpetrators, end the abuse, and bring help to the victim. We surveyed 1,679 women undergraduates to understand disclosure of childhood sexual, physical, and emotional abuse, and, for the first time, witnessed domestic violence, which many consider to be emotionally abusive. A substantial minority of victims failed to ever disclose their sexual abuse (23%), physical abuse (34%), emotional abuse (20%), and witnessed domestic violence (29%). Overall, abuse-specific factors were better predictors of disclosure than individual-level characteristics. Disclosure of sexual abuse was related to experiencing more frequent abuse (by the same and by multiple perpetrators), being more worried about injury and more upset at the time of the abuse, and self-labeling as a victim of abuse. Disclosure of physical abuse was related to experiencing more frequent abuse (by the same and multiple perpetrators), being less emotionally close to the perpetrator, being older when the abuse ended, being more worried and upset, and self-labeling as a victim. Disclosure of emotional abuse was associated with being older when the abuse ended, and being more worried and upset. Disclosure was unrelated to victim demographic characteristics or defensive reactions (dissociative proneness, fantasy proneness, repressive coping style, and temporary forgetting), except that among physical and emotional abuse victims, repressors were less likely to disclose than non-repressors. Disclosure of witnessing domestic violence was not significantly related to any factors measured.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260514564155

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 85

Authors
Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Epstein, M. A., Wiley, T. R. A., Reynolds, C. E., & Rudnicki, A. G.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bottoms, Bette L.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2014-12-29
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1308-1339
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2061593501
Cited by
85
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • American Psychological Association
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
childhood abuse, disclosure of abuse, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, childhood emotional abuse, witnessing domestic violence, individual differences, repressive coping, dissociation, fantasy proneness, abuse frequency, female university students
MeSH terms
Exposure to Violence, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Individuality, Middle Aged, Truth Disclosure, Domestic Violence, Survivors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review