Abuse Characteristics and Individual Differences Related to Disclosing Childhood Sexual, Physical, and Emotional Abuse and Witnessed Domestic Violence
Abstract
Many adult survivors of childhood abuse hide their victimization, avoiding disclosure that could identify perpetrators, end the abuse, and bring help to the victim. We surveyed 1,679 women undergraduates to understand disclosure of childhood sexual, physical, and emotional abuse, and, for the first time, witnessed domestic violence, which many consider to be emotionally abusive. A substantial minority of victims failed to ever disclose their sexual abuse (23%), physical abuse (34%), emotional abuse (20%), and witnessed domestic violence (29%). Overall, abuse-specific factors were better predictors of disclosure than individual-level characteristics. Disclosure of sexual abuse was related to experiencing more frequent abuse (by the same and by multiple perpetrators), being more worried about injury and more upset at the time of the abuse, and self-labeling as a victim of abuse. Disclosure of physical abuse was related to experiencing more frequent abuse (by the same and multiple perpetrators), being less emotionally close to the perpetrator, being older when the abuse ended, being more worried and upset, and self-labeling as a victim. Disclosure of emotional abuse was associated with being older when the abuse ended, and being more worried and upset. Disclosure was unrelated to victim demographic characteristics or defensive reactions (dissociative proneness, fantasy proneness, repressive coping style, and temporary forgetting), except that among physical and emotional abuse victims, repressors were less likely to disclose than non-repressors. Disclosure of witnessing domestic violence was not significantly related to any factors measured.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrospective assessments of childhood physical abuse are particularly affected by social desirability concerns.
“Some evidence suggests that retrospective assessments of CPA are particularly affected by social desirability concerns (Bottoms et al., 2016)”
From Childhood Physical Abuse and Antisocial Traits: Mediating Role of Posttraumatic Stress Symptom Clusters (2022) · cites this paper as Bottoms et al., 2016
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 85
- Authors
- Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Epstein, M. A., Wiley, T. R. A., Reynolds, C. E., & Rudnicki, A. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bottoms, Bette L.
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-12-29
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1308-1339
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W2061593501
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- American Psychological Association
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- childhood abuse, disclosure of abuse, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, childhood emotional abuse, witnessing domestic violence, individual differences, repressive coping, dissociation, fantasy proneness, abuse frequency, female university students
- MeSH terms
- Exposure to Violence, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Individuality, Middle Aged, Truth Disclosure, Domestic Violence, Survivors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review