Cited by 15Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Abuse and Trauma

Therapeutic Progression in Abused Women Following a Drug-Addiction Treatment Program

Open access
Fernández-Montalvo, Javier, López-Goñi, José J., Arteaga, Alfonso, Cacho, Raúl, Azanza, Paula·2017·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

This study explored the prevalence of victims of abuse and the therapeutic progression among women who sought treatment for drug addiction. A sample of 180 addicted Spanish women was assessed. Information was collected on the patients’ lifetime history of abuse (psychological, physical, and/or sexual), socio-demographic factors, consumption variables, and psychological symptoms. Of the total sample, 74.4% ( n = 134) of the addicted women had been victims of abuse. Psychological abuse affected 66.1% ( n = 119) of the patients, followed by physical abuse (51.7%; n = 93) and sexual abuse (31.7%; n = 57). Compared with patients who had not been abused, the addicted women with histories of victimization scored significantly higher on several European version of the Addiction Severity Index (EuropASI) and psychological variables. Specifically, physical abuse and sexual abuse were related to higher levels of severity of addiction. Regarding therapeutic progression, the highest rate of dropout was observed among victims of sexual abuse (63.5%; n = 33), followed by victims of physical abuse (48.9%; n = 23). Multivariate analysis showed that medical and family areas of the EuropASI, as well as violence problems and suicide ideation, were the main variables related to physical and/or sexual abuse. Moreover, women without abuse and with fewer family problems presented the higher probability of treatment completion. The implications of these results for further research and clinical practice are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260515591980

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 15

Authors
Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Arteaga, A., Cacho, R., & Azanza, P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2015-06-30
Volume
32
Issue
13
Pages
2046-2056
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W854751924
Cited by
15
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
drug addiction, women, abuse history, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, treatment discontinuation, Addiction Severity Index, suicidal ideation, family problems, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Psychological Tests, Risk Factors, Spain, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Violence, Multivariate Analysis, Battered Women, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review