Therapeutic Progression in Abused Women Following a Drug-Addiction Treatment Program
Open accessAbstract
This study explored the prevalence of victims of abuse and the therapeutic progression among women who sought treatment for drug addiction. A sample of 180 addicted Spanish women was assessed. Information was collected on the patients’ lifetime history of abuse (psychological, physical, and/or sexual), socio-demographic factors, consumption variables, and psychological symptoms. Of the total sample, 74.4% ( n = 134) of the addicted women had been victims of abuse. Psychological abuse affected 66.1% ( n = 119) of the patients, followed by physical abuse (51.7%; n = 93) and sexual abuse (31.7%; n = 57). Compared with patients who had not been abused, the addicted women with histories of victimization scored significantly higher on several European version of the Addiction Severity Index (EuropASI) and psychological variables. Specifically, physical abuse and sexual abuse were related to higher levels of severity of addiction. Regarding therapeutic progression, the highest rate of dropout was observed among victims of sexual abuse (63.5%; n = 33), followed by victims of physical abuse (48.9%; n = 23). Multivariate analysis showed that medical and family areas of the EuropASI, as well as violence problems and suicide ideation, were the main variables related to physical and/or sexual abuse. Moreover, women without abuse and with fewer family problems presented the higher probability of treatment completion. The implications of these results for further research and clinical practice are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three additional studies on depression did not report test-statistics.
“Three studies did not report test-statistics [46, 78, 79].”
From The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
Table 1 (shown under Discussion) reports a test statistic for severe depression: χ² = 4.3 with 3 degrees of freedom. This contradicts the claim insofar as it attributes a failure to report depression test statistics to this study; the other two cited studies are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThirteen additional studies found a significant association between psychological violence and anxiety.
“Finally, thirteen studies found a significant association between psychological violence and anxiety [13, 38, 40, 49, 59, 63, 65, 68, 78, 80–83], while three studies found an insignificant association [61, 76, 84].”
From The psychological subtype of intimate partner violence and its effect on mental health: a systematic review with meta-analyses (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Fernández-Montalvo, J., López-Goñi, J. J., Arteaga, A., Cacho, R., & Azanza, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-06-30
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2046-2056
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W854751924
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Academica-e (Universidad Pública de Navarra) (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Keywords
- drug addiction, women, abuse history, psychological violence, physical abuse, sexual abuse, treatment discontinuation, Addiction Severity Index, suicidal ideation, family problems, addiction treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Dropouts, Psychological Tests, Risk Factors, Spain, Psychotherapeutic Processes, Violence, Multivariate Analysis, Battered Women, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review