Childhood Trauma, Trait Anxiety, and Anxious Attachment as Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence in College Students
Abstract
The current study investigates the relationship between intimate partner violence (IPV), childhood trauma, trait anxiety, depression, and anxious attachment in college students. Ninety-three male and 161 female undergraduate students at Fairfield University, ranging in age from 17 to 23, with a mean age of 18.8 years, participated. Participants completed five self-report inventories: The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI), the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS). IPV perpetration in college dating relationships was related to childhood emotional and physical abuse, emotional and physical neglect, and trait anxiety. IPV victimization in college dating relationships was related to childhood emotional and physical abuse, childhood emotional and physical neglect, and an anxious attachment style. IPV perpetration and victimization were also significantly correlated with one another. Subscale analyses suggest that childhood emotional abuse was related to being both the perpetrator and victim of verbal or emotional abuse in dating relationships. Childhood physical abuse, physical neglect, and emotional abuse were related to both perpetration and victimization of physical IPV. Threatening behavior perpetration in dating relationships was related to childhood emotional abuse, emotional neglect, physical abuse, and physical neglect; however, b…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The weak correlation of 0.06 and a study that did not obtain any significant outcome may be explained by the use of the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS), which might not be sensitive enough as a tool for this specific target group.
“Both the weak correlation of 0.06 and a study that did not obtain any significant outcome (McClure and Parmenter, 2017) may be explained by the use of the Adult Attachment Scale (AAS, Hazan and Shaver, 1987), which might be not enough sensitive as a tool for this specific target group, as claimed by Tasso et al. (2012).”
From Exploring Relationships: A Systematic Review on Intimate Partner Violence and Attachment (2018) · cites this paper as McClure and Parmenter, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 28 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- McClure, M. M., & Parmenter, M.
- Affiliations
- Fairfield University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McClure, Margaret M.
- ORCID
- McClure, Margaret M.
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-08-24
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 23-24
- Pages
- 6067-6082
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W2748708655
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- intimate partner violence, childhood trauma, trait anxiety, attachment anxiety, university students, dating violence, emotional abuse, physical abuse, emotional neglect, physical neglect, depression, threatening behavior, victimization, perpetration
- MeSH terms
- Intimate Partner Violence, Physical Abuse, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Students, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review