Cited by 5Child Welfare and AdoptionChildren's Rights and ParticipationLegal and Social Justice Studies

The Role of Kinship and Siblings in Young Children’s Placement Preferences

Open access
Dickerson, Kelli L., Lyon, Thomas D., Quas, Jodi A.·2021·Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Abstract

Although considerable attention has been directed toward the most appropriate placement for children following removal from home due to maltreatment, very little of this attention has focused on children’s stated preferences, particularly when children are young. Specifically, children below 12 years of age are often presumed incompetent to form reasoned judgments about their best interests in placement. This assumption, however, has rarely been tested directly. We surveyed 100 4- to 11-year-olds removed from home because of maltreatment about their placement preferences. Children were less likely to indicate they wanted to return home if they were placed with siblings or with kin, consistent with statutory placement preferences. These results suggest that young children may express more mature preferences than recognized by the law, and that there may be value in asking even relatively young children about with whom they would like to live following their removal from home as a result of maltreatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0886260519854560

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Bruck M, Ceci SJ, & Hembrooke H (2002). The nature of children’s true and false narratives. Developmental Review, 22, 520– 554.
  2. Cascardi M, Poythress NG, & Hall A (2000). Procedural justice in the context of civil commitment: An analogue study. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 731– 740. 11180419
  3. Casper JD, Tyler T, & Fisher B (1988). Procedural justice in felony cases. Law & Society Review, 22, 483– 507.
  4. Chapman MV, Wall A, & Barth RP (2004). Children’s voices: The perceptions of children in foster care. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74, 293– 304. 15291706
  5. Cuddeback GS (2004). Kinship family foster care: A methodological and substantive synthesis of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 26, 623– 639.
  6. Festinger T (1983). No one ever asked us: A postscript to foster care. New York: Columbia University Press.
  7. Fox A, & Berrick JD (2007). A response to no one ever asked us: A review of children’s experiences in out-of-home care. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 24, 23– 51.
  8. Fox A, Berrick JD, & Frasch K (2008). Safety, family, permanency, and child wellbeing: What we can learn from children. Child Welfare, 87, 63– 90. 18575258
  9. Garrison EG (1991). Children’s competence to participate in divorce custody decision-making. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 20, 78– 87.
  10. Hegar RL (2005). Sibling placement in foster care and adoption: An overview of international research. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 717– 739.
  11. Herrick MA, & Piccus W (2005). Sibling connections: The importance of nurturing sibling bonds in the foster care system. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 845– 861.
  12. Katz C, & Hamama L (2018). The sibling relationship in the context of child maltreatment: What do we know? What are the directions for the future? Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19, 343– 351. 27439717
  13. Keller TE, Wetherbee K, Le Prohn NS, Payne V, Sim K, & Lamont ER (2001). Competencies and problem behaviors of children in family foster care: Variations by kinship placement status and race. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 915– 940.
  14. Lamb ME, Hershkowitz I, Orbach Y, & Esplin P (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  15. Leathers SJ (2005). Separation from siblings: Associations with placement adaptation and outcomes among adolescents in long-term foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 793– 819.
  16. Libby AM, Orton HD, Barth RP, Webb MB, Burns BJ, Wood P, & Spicer P (2006). Alcohol, drug, and mental health specialty treatment services and race/ethnicity: A national study of children and families involved with child welfare. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 628– 631. 16507729 PMC1470541
  17. Mazerolle L, Bennett S, Davis J, Sargeant E, & Manning M (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245– 274.
  18. Merritt DH (2011). Should I stay or should I go? Correlates of children’s placement preferences. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 5, 408– 425.
  19. Milojevich HM, Quas JA, & Adams BL (2017). Quality of sibling relationships in maltreated youth residing in out-of-home-care. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0886260517730562 PMC7197295 29294913 · DOI
  20. Rubin DM, Downes KJ, O’Reilly ALR, Mekonnen R, Luan X, & Localio R (2008). The impact of kinship care on behavioral well-being for children in out-of-home care. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 162, 550– 556. 18524746 PMC2654276
  21. Tarren-Sweeney M, & Hazell P (2005). The mental health and socialization of siblings in care. Children and Youth Services Review, 27, 821– 843.
  22. Wulczyn F (2004). Family reunification. The Future of Children, 14, 94– 113. 15072020

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dickerson, K. L., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Dickerson, Kelli L.
Venue
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2019-06-16
Volume
36
Issue
17-18
Pages
NP9299-NP9316
ISSN
  • 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6518
OpenAlex
W2948244479
Cited by
5
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD087685)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
child abuse, sibling placement, young children, best interests of the child, child custody decisions, child competence, child removal
MeSH terms
Child, Child Abuse, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Foster Home Care, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review