Short-Term and Long-Term Impacts of Financial Sextortion on Victim’s Mental Well-Being
Abstract
Sextortion occurs when an individual threatens to distribute a victim’s intimate images, videos, or information unless they comply with the perpetrator’s demands. In financially motivated sextortion, these demands include payment of a ransom. Despite global increases in financially motivated sextortion victimization, there is limited research on the psychological impacts of this type of victimization. Leveraging 332 threads (3,276 posts) from a popular sextortion support forum, the purpose of this research was to use inductive qualitative methods to understand how financially motivated sextortion impacts victims’ mental well-being, their online engagement, and how they process and deal with these impacts. The results illustrate four main concepts: short-term impacts, long-term impacts, coping strategies, and getting better over time. Short-term impacts included worry, stress, anxiety, self-blame, and somatic symptoms of stress. Long-term impacts included enduring episodes of anxiety. Some sources of coping reported by forum users were to confide in a trusted friend, stay offline, or seek professional mental health care. Despite these impacts, many forum members expressed a sense that their anxiety and distress “get better overtime,” a concept that was assisted through active coping strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding of Cluster 3 provides rare empirical support for prior research linking sextortion to severe outcomes such as suicide and enduring psychological harm by demonstrating a direct connection between technologically mediated coercion and fatal real-world consequences.
“This finding provides rare empirical support for prior research linking sextortion to severe outcomes such as suicide and enduring psychological harm by demonstrating a direct connection between technologically mediated coercion and fatal real-world consequences (Nilsson et al., 2019; O’Malley, 2023, 2025).”
From Constructing Offender Typologies From Judicial Data: A Clustering Analysis of Sextortion Cases (2026) · cites this paper as O’Malley, 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- O’Malley, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida, Sarasota, USA
- Corresponding author
- O’Malley, Roberta Liggett
- Venue
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-03-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 13-14
- Pages
- 8563-8592
- ISSN
- 0886-2605 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6518
- OpenAlex
- W4323036502
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 14.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Interpersonal Violence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Keywords
- psychological well-being, coping strategies, anxiety, self-blame, online engagement
- MeSH terms
- Psychological Well-Being, Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Humans, Mental Health, Crime Victims
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review