The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Benefits of Backlash: EU Accession and the Organization of LGBT Activism in Postcommunist Poland and the Czech Republic
Abstract
How can we explain variation in the organization of LGBT activism in postcommunist Europe, both across countries and over time? Much of the extant scholarship has analyzed the comparative politics of homosexuality in the region in terms of transnational norm diffusion occurring within the context of EU accession and integration. Thus, it emphasizes the empowerment of domestic gay rights groups either through maximizing the leverage of their external allies or through increasing their linkage with transnational advocacy networks. This paper argues that the effectiveness of these diffusion mechanisms is strongly constrained by the collective action problems faced by gay rights activists in societies with a legacy of civil society underdevelopment, such as in postcommunist Europe. We argue that hard-right backlash is a critical domestic factor that can help overcome these collective action problems, enabling gay rights activists to find resonant frames, build internal solidarity, and win allies—even when social movement resources are minimal. The research focuses on a close comparison of Poland and the Czech Republic since 1989 and draws on field interviews and original sources to process-trace the resonance of LGBT rights frames and how activism is organized. By building organizationally robust activism, postcommunist gay rights movements lay claim to full membership in the political community, exercise civil rights as LGBT citizens (not merely as private ones), and expand the sphere of “sexual citizenship.”
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Table 1 also indicates that since around 2010, the expansion of LGBTQ rights has stalled, and efforts to curb LGBTQ rights have gained momentum (O'Dwyer 2018; Guasti and Bustikova 2020).”
From Varieties of Illiberal Backlash in Central Europe (2023) · cites this paper as O'Dwyer 2018
Citations
Cited by
Varieties of Illiberal Backlash in Central Europe
Guasti, P., & Bustikova, L. (2023) · Problems of Post-Communism · doi:10.1080/10758216.2022.2156889 · Cited by 73
“Table 1 also indicates that since around 2010, the expansion of LGBTQ rights has stalled, and efforts to curb LGBTQ rights have gained momentum (O’Dwyer 2018; Guasti and Bustikova 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Dwyer, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- O’Dwyer, Conor
- ORCID
- O’Dwyer, Conor
- Venue
- East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-04-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 892-923
- ISSN
- 0888-3254 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-8371
- OpenAlex
- W2804106980
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- East European Politics and Societies and Cultures (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Endowment for the Humanities (Summer Stipend Award (2013))
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Keywords
- LGBT activism, gay rights movement, EU accession, backlash, collective action problems, advocacy networks, sexual citizenship, Poland, Czech Republic, post-communist Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review