Cited by 29Gender and Feminist StudiesEastern European Communism and ReformsLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Benefits of Backlash: EU Accession and the Organization of LGBT Activism in Postcommunist Poland and the Czech Republic

O’Dwyer, Conor·2018·East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures

Abstract

How can we explain variation in the organization of LGBT activism in postcommunist Europe, both across countries and over time? Much of the extant scholarship has analyzed the comparative politics of homosexuality in the region in terms of transnational norm diffusion occurring within the context of EU accession and integration. Thus, it emphasizes the empowerment of domestic gay rights groups either through maximizing the leverage of their external allies or through increasing their linkage with transnational advocacy networks. This paper argues that the effectiveness of these diffusion mechanisms is strongly constrained by the collective action problems faced by gay rights activists in societies with a legacy of civil society underdevelopment, such as in postcommunist Europe. We argue that hard-right backlash is a critical domestic factor that can help overcome these collective action problems, enabling gay rights activists to find resonant frames, build internal solidarity, and win allies—even when social movement resources are minimal. The research focuses on a close comparison of Poland and the Czech Republic since 1989 and draws on field interviews and original sources to process-trace the resonance of LGBT rights frames and how activism is organized. By building organizationally robust activism, postcommunist gay rights movements lay claim to full membership in the political community, exercise civil rights as LGBT citizens (not merely as private ones), and expand the sphere of “sexual citizenship.”

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0888325418762051

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
O’Dwyer, C.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
O’Dwyer, Conor
Venue
East European Politics and Societies: and Cultures
Published
2018-04-10
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
892-923
ISSN
  • 0888-3254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8371
OpenAlex
W2804106980
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
East European Politics and Societies and Cultures (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Endowment for the Humanities (Summer Stipend Award (2013))
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Eastern European Communism and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
LGBT activism, gay rights movement, EU accession, backlash, collective action problems, advocacy networks, sexual citizenship, Poland, Czech Republic, post-communist Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review