Cited by 41Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Evaluation of a Web-Based Professional Development Program (Project ACE) for Teachers of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Rakap, Salih, Jones, Hazel A., Emery, Alice Kaye·2015·Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children

Abstract

This article describes the development, implementation, and second-year evaluation of Project Autism Competencies for Endorsement (ACE), a web-based professional development (PD) program that is designed to train teachers currently working in the field to meet the unique and diverse needs of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). A description of the rationale for the project and an overview of the program of study are followed by the presentation of the second-year evaluation activities and their results. Preliminary findings of this study suggested that the web-based PD program was effective in helping teachers develop and improve their competencies, knowledge, and skills. Moreover, teachers felt comfortable using the teaching strategies they learned in the program and reported some application of these strategies in their practices. Also, most teachers reported their satisfaction with the web-based courses offered in the program. Implications for the future research and practice are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0888406414535821

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only Rakap, Jones, and Emery (2015) found scarce interactions and difficulties in building relationships with classmates to have little impact on teachers' learning and focused on course content to compensate for these social limitations.

    “Only Rakap, Jones, and Emery (2015) found scarce interactions and difficulties in building relationships with classmates to have little impact on teachers' learning and focused on course content to compensate for these social limitations.”

    From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Rakap, Jones, and Emery 2015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rakap, S., Jones, H. A., & Emery, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children
Published
2014-06-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
221-239
ISSN
  • 0888-4064 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-4931
OpenAlex
W2156661576
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teacher Education and Special Education The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, online professional development, teacher professional development, teacher competence, teacher job satisfaction, special education teachers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review