CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Breastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Development and Preterm CareInfant Nutrition and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of the Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS): A Study of Nurse-Mother Agreement

Nyqvist, Kerstin Hedberg, Rubertsson, Christine, Ewald, Uwe, Sjödén, Per-Olow·1996·Journal of Human Lactation
DOI 10.1177/089033449601200318
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Research on the development of preterm infant feeding behavior has focused mainly on bottlefeeding, using invasive methods or observations by professionals. In this study, a clinical method for observing breastfeeding was developed in collaboration between observers and mothers for the purpose of enabling neonatal personnel and mothers to describe developmental stages in preterm infant breastfeeding behavior. Tests of interobserver reliability resulted in acceptable agreement between observers, but a somewhat lower level of agreement between observers and mothers. The scale showed a good capacity to discriminate between infant gestational ages and can be used for helping mothers to identify their infants' emerging competence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/089033449601200318

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS), a 9-question validated tool, assessed feeding competency; scores <15 (out of 20) signified poor feeding competency.

    “The Preterm Infant Breastfeeding Behavior Scale (PIBBS), a 9-question validated tool, assessed feeding competency based on direct feeding observation by trained study nurses measuring infant rooting efforts, latch effort, latch duration, sucking duration, and swallowing; scores <15 (out of 20) signified poor feeding competency [16].”

    From Facility-based care for moderately low birthweight infants in India, Malawi, and Tanzania (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1016/S0266-6138(88)80071-8 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/089033449100700115 · DOI
  3. 10.1177/089033449200800216 · DOI
  4. Shrago L, 1992, Clin Iss Perinat Wom Health Nurs, 3, 583
  5. Palmer MM, 1993, J Perinatol, 13, 28
  6. 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1989.tb00883.x · DOI
  7. Bire B J-A, 1991, Dev Med Child Neurol, 64, 37
  8. 10.1016/0378-3782(85)90100-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1991.tb14798.x · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00005237-199306000-00009 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/00006199-199107000-00015 · DOI
  12. 10.1097/00006199-199303000-00007 · DOI
  13. Wolff PH, 1963, Pediatrics, 6, 943
  14. Anderson GC, 1990, J Perinatol, 11, 216
  15. 10.1016/0020-7292(90)90911-4 · DOI
  16. Gomez HM, 1992, Int Child Health, 3, 55
  17. Evans IM, 1982, Handbook of BehavioralAssessment, 601
  18. Colombo J, 1987, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 423
  19. Prechtl HFR, 1969, Clinics in Developmental Medicine, 44
  20. 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1990.tb01638.x · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0266-6138(86)80041-9 · DOI
  22. Grybowski JD, 1969, Pediatrics, 43, 96, 10.1542/peds.43.1.96 · DOI
  23. 10.1177/089033449200800111 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/978-1-4899-0442-3_2 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/089033449000600416 · DOI
  26. Bakeman R, 1992, An introduction to sequential analysis, 78
  27. 27. Fleiss JL: Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981; pp. 212-225.
  28. 10.2307/2987937 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Dubowitz L, Clinics in Developmental Medicine 1981, 1
  30. Brazelton TB, 1984, Clinics in Developmental Medicine 1984, 19
  31. 10.1093/jpepsy/13.1.55 · DOI
  32. Schedle A, 1989, Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 36, 174
  33. 10.1002/1097-0355(198623)7:3<189::AID-IMHJ2280070303>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  34. 10.1177/089033449200800119 · DOI
  35. Daniels H, 1986, J Dev Physiol, 8, 117
  36. 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1989.tb11216.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0163-6383(90)90005-S · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nyqvist, K. H., Rubertsson, C., Ewald, U., & Sjödén, P.-O.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
ORCID
Rubertsson, Christine
Venue
Journal of Human Lactation
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1996-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 0890-3344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5732
DOI
10.1177/089033449601200318
OpenAlex
W2015003289
Cited by
124
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Human Lactation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
preterm infants, breastfeeding behavior, inter-rater reliability, gestational age, neonatal nursing, infant competence
MeSH terms
Breast Feeding, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Mothers, Nursing Assessment, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review