Cited by 199Work-Family Balance ChallengesGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsGender and Feminist Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

CULTURAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF FAMILY SCHEMAS: The Case of Women Finance Executives

BLAIR-LOY, MARY·2001·Gender & Society

Abstract

This article uses interview data to examine changes over time in the cultural constructions of executive women's family responsibilities. The author delineates two gendered cultural structures: the family devotion schema and the work devotion schema. Respondents are caught in the conflict between each schema's competing vision of a worthwhile life. Older respondents are more likely to accept the devotion schema's definition of an irreconcilable conflict between work and family, prompting many to avoid marriage or childbearing. In contrast, many members of the youngest cohort, who came of age after the early 1970s women's movement, are refashioning the family devotion schema by subcontracting out domestic responsibilities while maintaining demanding careers. Yet, the family devotion schema continues to haunt all cohorts, enduring in its cognitive, normative, and emotional power. Gender, as expressed in cultural models of family, remains a powerful constraint on the hearts and minds of even professionally successful women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/089124301015005004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Alexander, Jeffrey C., Action and its environments: Toward a new synthesis
  2. Barnett, Rosalind C., She works/he works: How two-income families are happier, healthier, and better off.
  3. 10.1086/210177 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/230577 · DOI
  5. Coser, Lewis A., Greedy institutions
  6. Cott, Nancy., The bonds of motherhood: “Woman's sphere” in New England, 1780-1835.
  7. 10.1086/231294 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Farley, Reynolds., The new American reality.
  9. Garey, Anita Ilta., Weaving work and motherhood.
  10. Gerson, Kathleen., Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood.
  11. Glaser, Barney, The discovery of grounded theory.
  12. Goldscheider, Frances, New families, no families? The transformation of the American home.
  13. Hayghe, Howard, 1994, Monthly Labor Review, 117, 24
  14. Hays, Sharon., The cultural contradictions of motherhood.
  15. Hochschild, Arlie., The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.
  16. 10.1086/219652 · DOI
  17. Ireland, Mardy S., Reconceiving women: Separating motherhood from female identity.
  18. Jacobs, Jerry A., Revolving doors: Sex segregation and women's careers.
  19. Kessler-Harris, Alice., Debating affirmative action: Race, gender, ethnicity and the politics of inclusion
  20. Klein, Ethel., Gender politics.
  21. Korn/Ferry International., Decade of the executive woman.
  22. 10.1086/493998 · DOI
  23. Lipsitz Bem, Sandra., The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality.
  24. Lorber, Judith., Paradoxes of gender.
  25. Mannheim, Karl., Essays on the sociology of knowledge
  26. Marx Ferree, Myra, Controversy and coalition: The new feminist perspective.
  27. Nakano Glenn, Mothering: Ideology, experience and agency.
  28. 10.2307/2094837 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/089124388002001004 · DOI
  30. Potuchek, Jean L., Who supports the family? Gender and breadwinning in dual-earner families.
  31. Ragin, Charles., The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies.
  32. Reskin, Barbara F., Women's work, men's work: Sex segregation on the job.
  33. Risman, Barbara J., Gender vertigo: American families in transition.
  34. Schor, Juliet., The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure.
  35. 10.1086/229967 · DOI
  36. Shu, Xiaoling, 1998, Sociology of Education, 71, 44
  37. Skolnick, Arlene., Embattled paradise: The American family in an age of uncertainty.
  38. Spain, Daphne, Balancing act: Motherhood and employment among American women.
  39. U.S. Bureau of the Census., Marital status and living arrangements: March 1991.
  40. U.S. Department of Commerce., Statistical abstract of the United States 1986.
  41. U.S. Department of Commerce., Statistical abstract of the United States 1988.
  42. U.S. Department of Commerce., Statistical abstract of the United States 1992.
  43. 10.1177/089124396010003006 · DOI
  44. Wajcman, Judy., Managing like a man: Women and men in corporate management.
  45. 10.2307/2657300 · DOI
  46. Whittier, Nancy., Feminist generations: The persistence of the radical women's movement.
  47. Whyte, William H., Jr., The organization man.

Metadata

Authors
BLAIR-LOY, M.
Affiliations
Washington State University
Venue
Gender & Society
Published
2001-10
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
687-709
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
OpenAlex
W2134459154
Cited by
199
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
women executives, work-family conflict, gender roles, domestic responsibilities, women's movement, generational differences, marriage avoidance, childbearing, women's careers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review