Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations
Abstract
According to the perspective developed in this article, widely shared, hegemonic cultural beliefs about gender and their impact in what the authors call “social relational” contexts are among the core components that maintain and change the gender system. When gender is salient in these ubiquitous contexts, cultural beliefs about gender function as part of the rules of the game, biasing the behaviors, performances, and evaluations of otherwise similar men and women in systematic ways that the authors specify. While the biasing impact of gender beliefs may be small in any one instance, the consequences cumulate over individuals’ lives and result in substantially different outcomes for men and women. After describing this perspective, the authors show how it sheds newlight on some defining features of the gender system and illustrate its implications for research into specific questions about gender inequality.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gender is jointly constituted by gender beliefs that accord women a subordinate status and by an inequitable distribution of resources.
“We see gender as jointly constituted by gender beliefs that accord women a subordinate status and by an inequitable distribution of resources (Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 511).”
From Gendering Reciprocity (2013) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll 2004
Norms of fairness may be 'robust', but gender beliefs possess 'a devilish resilience'.
“Norms of fairness may be 'robust' (Folbre 2001, 30), but gender beliefs possess 'a devilish resilience' (Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 523).”
From Gendering Reciprocity (2013) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 523
These disparities can in part be attributed to stereotypes and bias that are influential at the individual interaction and organizational levels.
“These disparities can in part be attributed to stereotypes and bias that are influential at the individual interaction and organizational levels (Ridgeway and Correll, 2004; Weyer, 2007).”
From Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences (2017) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll, 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 82 · Cited by 1,823
- Authors
- Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 510-531
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W2567268209
- Cited by
- 1,823
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 122 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 65
- FWCI
- 28.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Keywords
- gender system, gender bias, gender inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review