Cited by 1,823Gender and Feminist StudiesGender Roles and Identity StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations

Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Correll, Shelley J.·2004·Gender & Society

Abstract

According to the perspective developed in this article, widely shared, hegemonic cultural beliefs about gender and their impact in what the authors call “social relational” contexts are among the core components that maintain and change the gender system. When gender is salient in these ubiquitous contexts, cultural beliefs about gender function as part of the rules of the game, biasing the behaviors, performances, and evaluations of otherwise similar men and women in systematic ways that the authors specify. While the biasing impact of gender beliefs may be small in any one instance, the consequences cumulate over individuals’ lives and result in substantially different outcomes for men and women. After describing this perspective, the authors show how it sheds newlight on some defining features of the gender system and illustrate its implications for research into specific questions about gender inequality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0891243204265269

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gender is jointly constituted by gender beliefs that accord women a subordinate status and by an inequitable distribution of resources.

    “We see gender as jointly constituted by gender beliefs that accord women a subordinate status and by an inequitable distribution of resources (Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 511).”

    From Gendering Reciprocity (2013) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll 2004

  • Norms of fairness may be 'robust', but gender beliefs possess 'a devilish resilience'.

    “Norms of fairness may be 'robust' (Folbre 2001, 30), but gender beliefs possess 'a devilish resilience' (Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 523).”

    From Gendering Reciprocity (2013) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll 2004, 523

  • These disparities can in part be attributed to stereotypes and bias that are influential at the individual interaction and organizational levels.

    “These disparities can in part be attributed to stereotypes and bias that are influential at the individual interaction and organizational levels (Ridgeway and Correll, 2004; Weyer, 2007).”

    From Time-to-Credit Gender Inequities of First-Year PhD Students in the Biological Sciences (2017) · cites this paper as Ridgeway and Correll, 2004

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 82 · Cited by 1,823

Authors
Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Venue
Gender & Society
Published
2004-08
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
510-531
ISSN
  • 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3977
OpenAlex
W2567268209
Cited by
1,823
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 122 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 154 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 116 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 105 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 63 · 2012: 65
FWCI
28.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
gender system, gender bias, gender inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review