“Straight Girls Kissing”?: Understanding Same-Gender Sexuality beyond the Elite College Campus
Abstract
Sexuality researchers have demonstrated how the progressive campuses of selective universities shape hookups, sexual fluidity, and same-gender sex among straight-identified women (“straight girls kissing”). However, this research cannot fully explain a puzzling demographic pattern: women with the lowest levels of educational attainment reported the highest lifetime prevalence of same-gender sex. To make sense of this puzzle, I draw on interviews with 35 women systematically recruited from a demographic survey. I find (1) early motherhood forecloses possibilities to develop or claim LGBTQ identities as women prioritize seemingly incompatible discourses of self-sacrifice and good motherhood; (2) sexual friendships and safety strategies provide opportunities to meaningfully explore same-gender sex and desire; and (3) participants reject “queer” and embrace “bisexual” in the opposite pattern observed among their more privileged peers. This study underscores the situated nature of sexuality knowledge by offering an intersectional analysis of how women beyond the college hookup scene and located outside spaces permeated with LGBTQ discourses enact sexual fluidity and make meaning of same-gender sex.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some individuals who report engaging in same-sex sex or who report same-sex attraction also express discomfort in labeling their sexual orientation, saying that current definitions of sexual identity categories do not accurately describe them, that they find them to be restrictive, or that they prefer other identities over non-heterosexual identity labels.
“Research shows that some individuals who report engaging in same-sex sex or who report same-sex attraction also express discomfort in labeling their sexual orientation, saying that current definitions of sexual identity categories do not accurately describe them, that they find them to be restrictive, or that they prefer other identities over non-heterosexual identity labels”
From Intersections between Sexual Identity, Sexual Attraction, and Sexual Behavior among a Nationally Representative Sample of American Men and Women (2019) · cites this paper as Budnick 2016
Cites
Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality
Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674073517 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Savin-Williams, R. C., & Vrangalova, Z. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.01.001 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2014) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/0731121413516608 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mishel, E. (2019) · Journal of Official Statistics · doi:10.2478/jos-2019-0036 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“…sexual orientation, saying that current definitions of sexual identity categories do not accurately describe them, that they find them to be restrictive, or that they prefer other identities over non-heterosexual identity labels (Budnick 2016; Diamond 2008; Savin-Williams and Vrangalova 2013).”
BackgroundSexual Identity‐Behavior Discordance in Canada
Silva, T., & Fetner, T. (2022) · Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie · doi:10.1111/cars.12372 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Budnick, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Budnick, Jamie
- ORCID
- Budnick, Jamie
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-08-06
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 745-768
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W2489436678
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 13.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- sexual fluidity, educational attainment, early motherhood, LGBTQ identity, bisexual identity, safety strategies, self-sacrifice, good motherhood, intersectionality, sexual knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review