The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covid-19, Flexible Working, and Implications for Gender Equality in the United Kingdom
Open accessAbstract
We examine the role flexible working has for gender equality during the pandemic, focusing on arrangements that give workers control over when and where they work. We use a survey of dual-earning working parents in the United Kingdom during the peak of the first lockdown, namely, between mid-May and mid-June 2020. Results show that in most households in our survey, mothers were mainly responsible for housework and child care tasks both before and during the lockdown period, although this proportion has slightly declined during the pandemic. In households where fathers worked from home during the pandemic, respondents were less likely to say that mothers were the ones solely or mostly responsible for housework and child care. Fathers who worked from home were more likely to say that they were doing more housework and child care during the lockdown period than they were before. Finally, we explore what we expect to happen in the postpandemic times in relation to flexible working and gender equality. The large expansion of flexible working we expect to happen may help reduce some of the gender inequalities that have exacerbated during the pandemic, but only if we reflect on and change our existing work cultures and gender norms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
HIERARCHIES, JOBS, BODIES: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
ACKER, J. (1990) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 · Cited by 7,374
Work/Family Border Theory: A New Theory of Work/Family Balance
Clark, S. C. (2000) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726700536001 · Cited by 3,203
The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home
Brines, J., Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1990) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352858 · Cited by 2,230
The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals
Mazmanian, M., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0806 · Cited by 1,364
COVID‐19 and the gender gap in work hours
Collins, C., Landivar, L. C., Ruppanner, L., & Scarborough, W. J. (2021) · Gender, Work & Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12506 · Cited by 1,214
Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma
Williams, J. C., Blair‐Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12012 · Cited by 744
Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction
Chung, H., & van der Lippe, T. (2020) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x · Cited by 721
Self-citationJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
(2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/(issn)2044-8325 · Cited by 712
Penalizing Men Who Request a Family Leave: Is Flexibility Stigma a Femininity Stigma?
Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2013) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12017 · Cited by 566
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, H., Birkett, H., Forbes, S., & Seo, H.
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-19
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-232
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W3138057641
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 65.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covid-19, Flexible Working, and Implications for Gender Equality in the United Kingdom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/08912432211001304
- The paper
- Chung, H., Birkett, H., Forbes, S., & Seo, H. (2021). Covid-19, Flexible Working, and Implications for Gender Equality in the United Kingdom. Gender & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211001304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.