The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Limits of “The Male Sex Role”: An Analysis of the Men's Liberation and Men's Rights Movements' Discourse
Abstract
Some feminists have seen sex role theory as limited, even dangerous; others see it as useful mid-range theory. This article sheds light on this debate through an examination of the discourse of the men's liberation movement of the 1970s. Men's liberation leaders grappled with the paradox of simultaneously acknowledging men's institutional privileges and the costs of masculinity to men. The language of sex roles was the currency through which they negotiated this paradox. By the late 1970s, men's liberation had disappeared. The conservative and moderate wings of men's liberation became an anti-feminist men's rights movement, facilitated by the language of sex roles. The progressive wing of men's liberation abandoned sex role language and formed a profeminist movement premised on a language of gender relations and power. The article ends with a discussion of the implications of this case for debates about sex role theory, and urges the study of contemporary organizations whose discourse is based on the language of sex roles.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Among the most prominent examples of organized misogynist groups is the Men's Rights Movement (MRM), which started in the 1970s (Michael A. Messner 1998).”
From “Victims of feminism”: exploring networked misogyny and #MeToo in the manosphere (2023) · cites this paper as Michael A. Messner 1998
In the citing paper
“Thus, feminist advances in gender equality, and progressive social movements are blamed for the unjust sexual market, women's privilege and men's supposed oppression and diminished status (Ging, 2017; Messner, 1998).”
From Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok (2023) · cites this paper as Messner, 1998
Citations
Cites
(1987) · Cited by 3,394
Family: Socialization and Interaction Process
Bales, R. F., & Parsons, T. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315824307 · Cited by 2,322
Jourard, S. M. (1964) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,269
David, D. S., & Pleck, J. H. (1983) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2068233 · Cited by 798
Changing Men: New Directions in Research on Men and Masculinity
Kimmel, M. S. (1988) · Family Relations · doi:10.2307/584327 · Cited by 739
The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology
Stacey, J., & Thorne, B. (1985) · Social Problems · doi:10.2307/800754 · Cited by 545
The Making of Masculinities : The New Men's Studies
Brod, H. (1987) · UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa) · Cited by 538
The Hearts of Men. American Dreams and the Flight from Commitment
Layton, L. (1984) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0984061181 · Cited by 491
The Forty-Nine Percent Majority: The Male Sex Role.
Scheff, J. H., Scheff, T. J., David, D. S., & Brannon, R. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2064860 · Cited by 469
Politics of masculinities: men in movements
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1232 · Cited by 466
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Andersen, D. 1977. Warren the success object. In For men against sexism, edited by Jon Snodrass. Albion, CA: Times Change Press.
- Baumli, Francis , ed. 1985. Men freeing men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male. Jersey City, NJ: New Atlantis.
- Brannon, Robert . 1981-82. Are the “Free Men” a faction of our movement? M: Gentle Men for Gender Justice 7 (winter).
- Doyle, R. 1985. Divorce. In Men freeing men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male, edited by Frances Baumli. Jersey City, NJ: New Atlantis.
- Farrell, Warren . 1974. The liberated man. New York: Random House.
- Free Men . 1997. National Coalition of Free Men. Web Page.
- Gerzon, Mark . 1982. A choice of heroes: The changing faces of America's manhood. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Goldberg, Herb . 1979. The new male: From macho to sensitive but still all male. New York: Signet.
- Haddad, R. 1985. Concepts and overview of the men's liberation movement. In Men freeing men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male, edited by F. Baumli. Jersey City, NJ: New Atlantis.
- Hanisch, C. 1975. Men's Liberation. In Feminist revolution, edited by Redstockings. New York: Random House.
- Reprint, in Men and masculinity, edited by J. H. Pleck and J. Sawyer. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Henley, Nancy . 1970. Male chauvinism: Attitudes and practices. Newsletter of the New University Conference. Chicago.
- Logan, D. 1985. Men abused by women. In Men freeing men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male, edited by F. Baumli. Jersey City, NJ: New Atlantis.
- Men's Consciousness-Raising Group . 1971. Unbecoming men. Washington, DC: Times Change.
- Messner, Michael A. . Forthcoming. Radical feminist and socialist feminist men's movements in the U.S. In Feminism and men: Toward a relational feminism, edited by S. Schacht and D. Ewing. New York: New York University Press.
- Nardi, P. 1994. Do ask and do tell: Stonewalling men's studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Pacific Sociological Association, San Diego, CA, April.
- Nichols, Jack . 1975. Men's liberation: A new definition of masculinity. New York: Penguin.
- Panghorn, K. 1985. The murdered husband: Family violence and women's lib. In Men freeing men: Exploding the myth of the traditional male, edited by F. Baumli. Jersey City, NJ: New Atlantis.
- Pleck, J. H. 1974. Men's power with women, other men, and in society: A men's movement analysis. In Women and men: The consequences of power, edited by D. V. Hiller and R. Sheets. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Office of Women's Studies.
- Sawyer, Jack . 1970. The male liberation movement. A workshop presented at the Women's Liberation Teach-in, Northwestern University, 8 March. Published in revised form in 1970 as “On male liberation,” Liberation (August-September-October).
- Snodgrass, Jon . 1977. For men against sexism. Albion, CA: Times Change.
- Straton, Jack C. 1994. The myth of the “battered husband syndrome.” Masculinities 2:79-82.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere
Ging, D. (2019) · Men and Masculinities · doi:10.1177/1097184x17706401 · Cited by 1,245
Drinking male tears: language, the manosphere, and networked harassment
Marwick, A. E., & Caplan, R. (2018) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568 · Cited by 495
Anderson, K. L., & Umberson, D. (2001) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124301015003003 · Cited by 427
Evans, J. A., Frank, B. W., Oliffe, J. L., & Gregory, D. (2011) · Journal of Men s Health · doi:10.1016/j.jomh.2010.09.227 · Cited by 377
Perpetrator or Victim? Relationships Between Intimate Partner Violence and Well‐Being
Anderson, K. L. (2002) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00851.x · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- MESSNER, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- MESSNER, MICHAEL A.
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-276
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W1980606485
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gender & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Keywords
- sex-role theory, men's rights movement, masculinity, gender relations, middle-range theory, institutional privilege, gender and power, 1970s counterculture, organizational discourse
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review