The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CLASS-BASED MASCULINITIES: The Interdependence of Gender, Class, and Interpersonal Power
Abstract
This article presents a theoretical framework that views interpersonal power as interdependent with broader structures of gender and class inequalities. In contrast to oversimplified, gender-neutral or gender-static approaches, this approach illuminates the ways that structures of inequality are expressed in ideological hegemonies, which enhance, legitimate, and mystify the interpersonal power of privileged men relative to lower-status men and women in general. The discussion centers on how the relational construction of ascendant and subordinated masculinities provide men with different modes of interpersonal power that, when exercised, (re)construct and reaffirm interclass male dominance. Examples of how the construction of femininity can undermine women's interpersonal power and implications for other forms of masculinities and femininities are discussed. Examples are drawn from an analysis of conjugal power in the accounts of remarried individuals' first and second marriages to illustrate the main points of this perspective.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Outline of a Theory of Practice
Bourdieu, P. (1977) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812507 · Cited by 27,606
(1980) · Cited by 22,286
Outline of a Theory of Practice.
Frank, A. W., & Bourdieu, P. (1980) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2066038 · Cited by 14,545
Wallace, A. F. C., & Garfinkel, H. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092245 · Cited by 12,445
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
WEST, C., & ZIMMERMAN, D. H. (1987) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 · Cited by 8,954
Men and Women of the Corporation.
Strauss, G., & Kanter, R. M. (1978) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.2307/2522922 · Cited by 7,288
Lukes, S. (2005) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,653
Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci
Gramsci, A., Hoare, Q., & Nowell‐Smith, G. (2015) · Cited by 6,310
Cited by
Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: a theory of gender and health
Courtenay, W. H. (2000) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00390-1 · Cited by 4,091
West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (2009) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243208326529 · Cited by 1,120
“Said and Done” Versus “Saying and Doing”: Gendering Practices, Practicing Gender at Work
Martin, P. Y. (2003) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002 · Cited by 721
Pyke, K. D. (2010) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1525/sop.2010.53.4.551 · Cited by 457
Self-citationCha, Y. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410365307 · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- PYKE, K. D.
- Venue
- Gender & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 527-549
- ISSN
- 0891-2432 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3977
- OpenAlex
- W2096185611
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 78
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CLASS-BASED MASCULINITIES: The Interdependence of Gender, Class, and Interpersonal Power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/089124396010005003
- The paper
- PYKE, K. D. (1996). CLASS-BASED MASCULINITIES: The Interdependence of Gender, Class, and Interpersonal Power. Gender & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124396010005003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.