Automated Brain MRI Volumetry Differentiates Early Stages of Alzheimer’s Disease From Normal Aging
Abstract
As an enrichment strategy supplemented by the diagnostic framework of subjective cognitive decline (SCD), SCD plus identifies features that may increase the likelihood of including future-Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. This study aimed to identify the shared and distinct atrophy patterns between patients specified by SCD plus and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI, a prodromal stage of AD) and to investigate the extent that automated brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry can differentiate patients with SCD from normal control (NC) participants and patients with aMCI. We acquired structural MRI brain scans from 44 patients with aMCI, 40 patients with SCD (who met the major criteria of SCD plus), and 48 NC participants. Automatic brain segmentation was performed to quantify the volumetric measures of cognitive-relevant areas. These volumetric measures were compared across the 3 groups with analysis of variance. In addition, we performed support vector machine analyses using volumetric measures of single regions or multiple regions to further evaluate the sensitivity of automated brain volumetry in differentiating a specific group from another. The atrophy patterns in patients with aMCI and SCD were similar. Using the regional volumetric measures, we achieved high performance in differentiating aMCI and SCD from NCs (average classification accuracy [ACC] > 90%). However, the performance was not ideal when differentiating aMCI from SCD (ACC < 63%). In conclusion, patients with SCD specified by SCD plus presented similar atrophy patterns as patients with aMCI, which was distinguishable from NC participants. Future studies should aim to associate the atrophy patterns of SCD with possible conversion to aMCI or AD in a longitudinal design.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Until recently, neuroimaging-based studies for classifying subjective cognitive decline have been scarce.
“However, until recently, neuroimaging-based studies for classifying SCD have been scarce [111, 126, 135, 204–206].”
From Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [126]
Cites
Using AUC and accuracy in evaluating learning algorithms
Huang, J., & Ling, C. X. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.50 · Cited by 2,148 · see citing works
Rathore, S., Habes, M., Iftikhar, M. A., Shacklett, A., & Davatzikos, C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.057 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Implementation of subjective cognitive decline criteria in research studies
Molinuevo, J. L., Rabin, L. A., Amariglio, R., Buckley, R., Dubois, B., Ellis, K. A., Ewers, M., Hampel, H., Klöppel, S., Rami, L., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.012 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Gray matter atrophy pattern in elderly with subjective memory impairment
Peter, J., Scheef, L., Abdulkadir, A., Boecker, H., Heneka, M., Wagner, M., Koppara, A., Klöppel, S., Jessen, F., & Initiative, A. D. N. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.05.1764 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Wolfsgruber, S., for the AgeCoDe Study Group, Kleineidam, L., Wagner, M., Mösch, E., Bickel, H., Lϋhmann, D., Ernst, A., Wiese, B., Steinmann, S., et al. (2016) · Journal of Alzheimer's Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-160407 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease
Wang, X., Huang, W., Su, L., Xing, Y., Jessen, F., Sun, Y., Shu, N., & Han, Y. (2020) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-020-00395-3 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Zhao, W., Luo, Y., Zhao, L., Mok, V., Su, L., Yin, C., Sun, Y., Lu, J., Shi, L., & Han, Y.
- Affiliations
- Capital Medical University (CN)
- BrainNow Research Institute, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China
- Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Southwest University (CN)
- Mudanjiang Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Shi, Lin
- Han, Ying
- Venue
- Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-09-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 354-364
- ISSN
- 0891-9887 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5708
- OpenAlex
- W2972204154
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Beijing Nature Science Foundation (7161009)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, subjective cognitive decline, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, brain atrophy patterns, brain segmentation, regional brain volume, support vector machine classification, normal aging, early detection of dementia
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review