CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14Education and Communication StudiesTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesEducation and Technology Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Head teachers’ change facilitation styles and teachers’ concerns about ICT integration

Jogezai, Nazir Ahmed, Ismail, Shaik Abdul Malik Mohamed, Baloch, Fozia Ahmed·2022·Management in Education
DOI 10.1177/0892020620932365
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The study aimed to identify the influence of head teachers’ change facilitator styles (CFS) on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. The three CFS (responder, manager and initiator) were studied in relation to its influence on teachers’ seven stages of concern (unconcerned, informational, personal, management, consequence, collaboration and refocusing) about ICT integration. Both styles and concerns are embodied in the concerns-based adoption model, which guided the theoretical framework of the study. This quantitative study used CFS and stages of concerns questionnaire to collect data from 276 secondary school teachers. Initially, teachers’ concerns were explored, followed by head teachers’ CFS and their influence on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. The results showed that secondary school teachers’ concerns, regarding ICT integration, were at the initial stages as reflected by their high mean scores on personal and informational stages. Findings inform about the responder as a dominant CFS used by secondary school head teachers. The data suggest differences in terms of the influence of head teachers’ three CFS on teachers’ concerns about ICT integration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0892020620932365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Al-Furaih SAA, 2018, Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 65, 1
  2. 10.1080/0309877X.2016.1177168 · DOI
  3. Al-Rawajfih K, 2010, Asian Social Science, 6, 54
  4. Al-Sharija M, 2012, Leadership practices of Kuwaiti secondary school principals for embedding ICT
  5. 10.1177/0013161X04269517 · DOI
  6. Baglibel M, 2014, International Studies in Educational Administration, 42, 55
  7. Baloch FA, 2007, Role of head teachers, in Karachi Pakistan, in professional development of teachers through collaborative learning
  8. 10.1111/bjet.12088 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/9781119207986 · DOI
  10. Cetinkaya B, 2012, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8, 155
  11. Chang IH, 2012, Educational Technology & Society, 15, 328
  12. 10.1007/s40299-012-0055-8 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/0263514042000290877 · DOI
  14. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
  15. Creswell J, 2009, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach
  16. 10.1016/S0360-1315(03)00012-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/105268461102100202 · DOI
  18. 10.5296/jpag.v2i1.1385 · DOI
  19. Fullan M, 2007, The New Meaning of Educational Change
  20. 10.3102/00028312006002207 · DOI
  21. George AA, 2006, Measuring Implementation in Schools: The Stages of Concern Questionnaire. Report
  22. Gurr D, 2004, Discourse, 25, 113
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01014.x · DOI
  24. Hall GE, 1999, School Climate: Measuring, Improving and Sustaining Healthy Learning Environments
  25. Hall GE, 1987, Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process
  26. Hall GE, 2011, Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes
  27. Hall GE, 2013, International Journal of Leadership and Change, 1, 36
  28. Hall GE, 1984, Educational Leadership, 41, 22
  29. Hall GE, 1973, Report
  30. 10.1080/02619768.2017.1285278 · DOI
  31. Hinkle DE, 2003, Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
  32. Hollingsworth M, 2004, Information Technology Leadership in Education: An Alberta Needs Assessment. Learning and Technology Research, Stakeholder Technology Branch
  33. Jogezai NA, 2019, Leadership change facilitation styles and teachers’ concerns about ICT integration
  34. 10.29333/ejmste/95124 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Johnson RB, 2004, Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches
  36. 10.1080/10494820.2015.1113710 · DOI
  37. Kearsley G, 1994, Educational Technology: Leadership Perspectives
  38. 10.1080/02619760500039928 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Neuman WL, 2014, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches
  41. Niazi S, 2012, Academic Research International, 7, 312
  42. 10.1080/18146627.2014.927159 · DOI
  43. 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-01-02-07 · DOI
  44. 10.1080/02188791.2012.756392 · DOI
  45. Pepe TM, 2016, Teacher perceptions and attitudes of classroom technology integration related to iPad
  46. Puteh SN, 2011, World Applied Sciences Journal, 14, 81
  47. Qutoshi SB, 2014, Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 8, 86
  48. Samancioglu M, 2015, International Journal of Leadership and Change, 3, 41
  49. Sarafidou JO, 2009, International Journal of Learning, 16, 431
  50. 10.1080/13603124.2015.1096078 · DOI
  51. Senun S, 2002, The relationship between change facilitator styles of secondary school principals and school climate as perceived by teachers in the Church of Christ schools in Thailand
  52. Sheninger E, 2014, Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times
  53. Stangor C, 1998, Research Method for the Behavioral Sciences
  54. Stewart SK, 2012, Principal change facilitator style and student achievement: a study of schools in the middle
  55. Sultana N, 2015, Asian Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 4, 153
  56. Tan SC, 2010, Curriculium, Technology and Transformationfor an Unkonw Future
  57. Thomas JM, 1972, The Management of Change and Conflict
  58. 10.1111/bjet.12478 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/14759390000200099 · DOI
  60. 10.1108/09578230310464666 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 14

Metadata

Authors
Jogezai, N. A., Ismail, S. A. M. M., & Baloch, F. A.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Jogezai, Nazir Ahmed
ORCID
Venue
Management in Education
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
82-93
ISSN
  • 0892-0206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-9883
DOI
10.1177/0892020620932365
OpenAlex
W4245169862
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Management in Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Communication Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
Keywords
school principals, ICT integration, teacher concerns, stages of concern, Concerns-Based Adoption Model, secondary school teachers, school leadership, educational technology adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Head teachers’ change facilitation styles and teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0892020620932365
The paper
Jogezai, N. A., Ismail, S. A. M. M., & Baloch, F. A. (2022). Head teachers’ change facilitation styles and teachers’ concerns about ICT integration. Management in Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620932365