The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Research Blenders
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Qualitative researchers are concerned with the changing nature of reality created through people’s experiences – an evolving reality in which the researcher and researched are mutually interactive and inseparable (Phillips, 1988b).”
From Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research (2002) · cites this paper as Phillips, 1988b
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Duffy, M.E., 1987, Image, 19, 130
- Duffy, M.E., 1987, Nursing & Health Care, 8, 356
- Field, P.A., 1985, Nursing research: The application of qualitative approaches
- 10.1097/00006199-198411000-00022 · DOI
- 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00006199-198703000-00013 · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X012003006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00012272-198301000-00008 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x · Cited by 1,601
Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research
Sale, J. E. M., Lohfeld, L. H., & Brazil, K. (2002) · Quality and Quantity · doi:10.1023/a:1014301607592 · Cited by 1,082
Metadata
- Authors
- Phillips, J. R.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Phillips, John R.
- ORCID
- Phillips, John R.
- Venue
- Nursing Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1988-02
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-5
- ISSN
- 0894-3184 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7409
- OpenAlex
- W4230261229
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Science Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
- Keywords
- nursing research, research utilization
- MeSH terms
- Nursing, Research Design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
