The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges
Abstract
This article examines methodological issues for content analytic research of the World Wide Web. The outline of content analysis as a systematic and quantitative scientific method for measuring the content of messages have existed for centuries. Nevertheless, its development and diffusion have been primarily spurred by the rise of mass media, newspapers in the 19th century and electronic media in the 20th century. The growth of the Internet promises to induce a similar expansion of its use and refinement of its techniques. The World Wide Web is characterized by its ubiquity, global reach, interactivity, decentralized, hyperlinked structure, and multimedia format. All of these characteristics present researchers with opportunities and challenges at each step of a content analysis: sampling, unitization, development of content categories, coding, and analysis. Based on a review of recent content analytic research, this article analyzes these issues and suggests methodological improvements for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
Byrne, B. M. (1998) · Cited by 3,873
Content Analysis in Communication Research.
de Sola Pool, I., & Berelson, B. (1952) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2088029 · Cited by 3,099
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
(2018) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/(issn)1083-6101 · Cited by 1,883
Accessibility of information on the web
Lawrence, S., & Giles, C. L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21987 · Cited by 1,349
Regime politics: governing Atlanta, 1946-1988
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-5402 · Cited by 1,146
Group decision making and communication technology
Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90047-b · Cited by 730
Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL: Essentials and Advances
Fox, J., & Hayduk, L. A. (1989) · Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie · doi:10.2307/3341309 · Cited by 446
Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building
Swales, J. M. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 430
The American Political Science Association
Willoughby, W. W. (1904) · Political Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2140238 · Cited by 273
Cited by
Connecting citizens and local governments? Social media and interactivity in major U.S. cities
Mossberger, K., Wu, Y., & Crawford, J. (2013) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.016 · Cited by 459
Stem Cell Clinics Online: The Direct-to-Consumer Portrayal of Stem Cell Medicine
Lau, D., Ogbogu, U., Taylor, B., Stafinski, T., Menon, D., & Caulfield, T. (2008) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.11.001 · Cited by 337
Horne, J., Recker, M., Michelfelder, I., Jay, J., & Kratzer, J. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118052 · Cited by 172
Studies of user-generated content: A systematic review
Naab, T. K., & Sehl, A. (2017) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884916673557 · Cited by 151
On the interpretation of digital trace data in communication and social computing research
Freelon, D. (2014) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.875018 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Weare, C., & Lin, W.-Y.
- Venue
- Social Science Computer Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272-292
- ISSN
- 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8286
- OpenAlex
- W1989623757
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 24.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/089443930001800304
- The paper
- Weare, C., & Lin, W.-Y. (2000). Content Analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and Challenges. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930001800304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
