Cited by 192ICT Impact and PoliciesInformation Society and Technology TrendsGender and Technology in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Social Stratification and the Digital Divide

Wilson, Kenneth R., Wallin, Jennifer S., Reiser, Christa·2003·Social Science Computer Review

Abstract

Whereas recent studies show that the size of the Digital Divide has been shrinking for many groups, this article explores whether social-economic factors explain the racial, geographic, and gender divides. Rural, minority, and female respondents were less likely to have home computers or to be connected to the Internet. Controlling for socioeconomic variables, the effects of rural residence and gender disappeared but African Americans were still less likely to have home computers or Internet access. When public Internet access was examined, rural residence and gender had no effect but African Americans were more likely to know of public facilities in their community even when socioeconomic variables were controlled. Future research needs to better understand the implications of different ways of using new technology (i. e., public vs. private access) and determine if digital technology deepens socioeconomic chasms or provides new opportunities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0894439303021002001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1080/105846099198569 · DOI
  2. Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81, 868-876.
  3. 10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.255 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/1081180X00005001005 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/089443930202000202 · DOI
  6. 10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.307 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/016001701761012962 · DOI
  8. 10.2190/LK8M-TWU3-MWGF-9T1T · DOI
  9. 10.1177/00027640121957240 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/107769900007700306 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0002764201045003004 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/08886504.2000.10782309 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0308-5961(01)00006-4 · DOI
  14. Lipke, D. J. (2000). Dead end ahead? American Demographics, 22, 10-12.
  15. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. Available from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/digitaldivide/ · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0308-5961(00)00018-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00005-5 · DOI
  18. Stewart, T. A. (1999). A nation of Net have nots? No. Fortune, 1, 184-188.
  19. Strover S. (1999). Rural Internet connectivity. Paper presented at the Telecommunications Research and Policy Conference. Available from http://www.utexas.edu/research/tipi/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, K. R., Wallin, J. S., & Reiser, C.
Affiliations
East Carolina University (US)
Venue
Social Science Computer Review
Published
2003-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
133-143
ISSN
  • 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8286
OpenAlex
W4246260720
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Science Computer Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › ICT Impact and Policies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Information Society and Technology Trends
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
digital divide, social stratification, socioeconomic status, racial disparities, African Americans, rural residence, gender differences, home computer ownership, internet access, public internet access, minority groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Stratification and the Digital Divide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0894439303021002001
The paper
Wilson, K. R., Wallin, J. S., & Reiser, C. (2003). Social Stratification and the Digital Divide. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439303021002001