CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 371Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsData Analysis and ArchivingComputational and Text Analysis Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilizing Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Review of Atlas.ti

Hwang, Sungsoo·2008·Social Science Computer Review
DOI 10.1177/0894439307312485
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Atlas.ti is qualitative data analysis (QDA) software, and its recent version 5.2.12 is now more user friendly as a Windows-based application. Atlas.ti provides some very useful tools in academic research, particularly for social science disciplines. This review offers a case study of utilizing a QDA software package, with two examples of research presented to show how to utilize Atlas.ti. This will serve as a practical guide for qualitative researchers who are beginning to use the QDA software Atlas.ti.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0894439307312485

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Brower, R., Paper presented at the Southeast Conference on Public Administration
  2. Maietta, R.C., 2006, Best practices: Delve a little deeper into your research. Inside Atlas.ti-Your Quarterly Newsletter, 2006/2
  3. Muhr, T., 2004, ATLAS.ti 5.0 [Version 5:]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 371

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hwang, S.
Affiliations
Grand Valley State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hwang, Sungsoo
ORCID
Hwang, Sungsoo
Venue
Social Science Computer Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2007-12-18
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
519-527
ISSN
  • 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8286
DOI
10.1177/0894439307312485
OpenAlex
W2156165826
Cited by
371
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Social Science Computer Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
ATLAS.ti, qualitative data analysis software, user manual, qualitative research, social science research, Windows applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review