Cited by 78Career Development and DiversityStudent Stress and CopingHigher Education and Employability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Associations Between Career Decision-Making Difficulties and Negative Emotional States

Anghel, Ella, Gati, Itamar·2021·Journal of Career Development

Abstract

Career decision-making difficulties are the challenges encountered by individuals before, during, or after choosing one’s career. This study tested the associations between career decision-making difficulties and depression, anxiety, and stress, considering the career decision status of participants. Students in a precollege preparatory program filled out questionnaires at the beginning and near the end of the academic year ( N = 137). The correlations between career decision-making difficulties, as measured by the Career Decision-Making Difficulties, and negative emotional states measured by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales, were positive at both administrations ( r T1 = .24, r T2 = .38). Using a multivariate analysis of variance, we have found that those who became more decided had fewer career decision-making difficulties ( d = 1.26). The changes in career decision status were not associated with either depression, anxiety, or stress. However, overall negative emotions intensified among students who were still undecided at the end of the year ( d = 0.72). Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0894845319884119

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Asis Y. (2012). An examination of interventions based on acceptance and commitment therapy and cognitive therapy and a validation of a measure for situational cognitive coping strategies (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from http://arad.mscc.huji.ac.il/dissertations/W/JMS/001880929.pdf (in Hebrew).
  2. Baqutayan S. M. S., 2014, International Journal of Development and Conflict, 4, 49
  3. Bubany S. T. (2011). Career decision-making competence: Formulation and testing of a measurement model (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/117813
  4. Costa P. T., 1992, Neo personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R)
  5. Reece E. J. (2011). Stress and career indecision: A comparison of senior athletes and non-athletes (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/4587
  6. Zhou M., 2013, Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3, 243

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 78

Metadata

Authors
Anghel, E., & Gati, I.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Gati, Itamar
Venue
Journal of Career Development
Published
2019-11-05
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
537-551
ISSN
  • 0894-8453 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-0856
OpenAlex
W2987943968
Cited by
78
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Career Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education and Employability
Keywords
career decision-making difficulties, career choice, depression, anxiety, stress, negative emotions, undecided students, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review