The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Overcoming the Paradox of Change without Difference: A Model of Change in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform
Abstract
Fundamental shifts in American educational practices have been difficult to accomplish and sustain. Most reform efforts that have sought to significantly alter accepted patterns of schooling have emerged in practice as shadows of their original intent. This article reviews four perspectives on educational reform that provide insights into the historical paradox of change without difference. None of those previous perspectives, however, adequately accounts for the complexity of the reform process. A new model of educational reform, the Teacher-Centered Systemic Reform (TCSR) model, integrates the previous perspectives and highlights teacher thinking as a central factor shaped by the interdependent influences of the general context of reform, a teacher’s personal profile, and the structural and cultural contexts of teachers’work within embedded systems. The authors provide examples that illustrate how the TCSR provides a more comprehensive framework for the design and evaluation of reform initiatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The "Grammar" of Schooling: Why Has it Been so Hard to Change?
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312031003453 · Cited by 1,169 · cited 1×
“Paradoxically, researchers who have examined practices within classrooms report little cor- responding change (Cuban, 1988, 1993; Gregg, 1995; Tyack & Tobin, 1994).”
Background
Cited by
What We Say Is Not What We Do: Effective Evaluation of Faculty Professional Development Programs
Ebert-May, D., Derting, T. L., Hodder, J., Momsen, J. L., Long, T. M., & Jardeleza, S. E. (2011) · BioScience · doi:10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9 · Cited by 420
Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.20329 · Cited by 339
Change theory and theory of change: what’s the difference anyway?
Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. C. (2020) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3 · Cited by 266
Garner, J. K., & Kaplan, A. (2019) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2018.1533811 · Cited by 182
Bottom-Up/Top-Down Leadership: Contradiction or Hidden Phenomenon
Kezar, A. (2012) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2012.11777264 · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J.
- Venue
- Educational Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 763-782
- ISSN
- 0895-9048 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3896
- OpenAlex
- W2094673227
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming the Paradox of Change without Difference: A Model of Change in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/089590402237312
- The paper
- Woodbury, S., & Gess-Newsome, J. (2002). Overcoming the Paradox of Change without Difference: A Model of Change in the Arena of Fundamental School Reform. Educational Policy. https://doi.org/10.1177/089590402237312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.