The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Channel One, the Anti-Commercial Principle, and the Discontinuous Ethos
Abstract
This article argues that administrators normally do a serious wrong when they contract with companies that market to children within schools. This is because in doing so, they violate the anti-commercial principle, which, in turn, is justified by the obligation schools have to facilitate the autonomy of their students. The author focuses particularly on Channel One but argues that numerous other standard features of school life are similarly problematic in the light of the values that justify the anti-commercial principle.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recognizing diverse perspectives has been both important in the practices of schools (i.e., Brighouse's (2005) discontinuous ethos) and how schools are governed (i.e., democratically).”
From Generative Artificial Intelligence, Formative Epistemic Injustice, and Educators’ Solutions (2026) · cites this paper as Brighouse 2005
Citations
Cites
Sherry, J. F., & Sternthal, B. (1992) · Cited by 2,915
Gunderman, R. B. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-85729-307-7_10 · Cited by 2,906
Reducing Children's Television Viewing to Prevent Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Robinson, T. N. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.16.1561 · Cited by 1,838
Andersen, R. E., Crespo, C. J., Bartlett, S. J., Cheskin, L. J., & Pratt, M. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.279.12.938 · Cited by 1,333
Galston, W. A. (1995) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/293725 · Cited by 708
School choice and social justice
Brighouse, H. (2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-6310 · Cited by 406
Self-citationThe Role of Television in the Construction of Consumer Reality
O’Guinn, T. C., & Shrum, L. J. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209483 · Cited by 403
Apple, M. W., & Apple, M. W. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203112847 · Cited by 231
Swift, A. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203423059 · Cited by 219
Schor, J. B. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 193
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Brighouse, H., 2003, Arizona Law Review, 45, 691
- Hoynes, W., 1997, News for a captive audience: An analysis of Channel One Extra!
- Hoynes, W., 1998, Journal of Curriculum Supervision, 13, 339
- MacLeod, C., 2003, Imprints, 7, 131
- McCawley, I., 2001, Marketing Week, 26
- Schor, J., 1998, The overspent American
- Schor, J., 2004, Born to buy
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Formative Epistemic Injustice, and Educators’ Solutions
Smith, S. J. (2026) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-026-10100-4 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Brighouse, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Brighouse, Harry
- ORCID
- Brighouse, Harry
- Venue
- Educational Policy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 528-549
- ISSN
- 0895-9048 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3896
- OpenAlex
- W1969273169
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Policy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Practices and Policies
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
- Keywords
- Channel One, marketing to children, school administrators, student independence, school-community relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review