Cited by 38Digital Economy and Work TransformationEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesLegal and Labor Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Normalizing and Resisting the New Precarity: A Case Study of the Indonesian Gig Economy

Yasih, Diatyka Widya Permata·2023·Critical Sociology

Abstract

The article examines the effects of the normalization of a new form of precarious work—tied to the gig economy and shaped by the imperatives of neoliberalism—in impeding the formation of solidarity that would enable workers to challenge structural issues that shape their precarity, although without entirely preventing collective organization. While the article focuses on the manifestation of the new precarity and workers’ responses in the app-based transport service in Indonesia, it seeks insights from the different experiences of other countries. It is argued here that the historical absence of the Standard Employment Relationship (SER), and the historically rooted ineffectiveness of labor and broader society movements aggravate problems in translating the precarity discourse into the organizational struggles of contemporary labor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/08969205221087130

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1177/1350508408088536 · DOI
  2. Aloisi A, 2016, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37, 620
  3. 10.1080/14442213.2011.636065 · DOI
  4. 10.4324/9781315593838 · DOI
  5. 10.5040/9781350220218 · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0950017015594097 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/1461444817729149 · DOI
  8. Cornelissen L, 2018, Parrhesia, 29, 125
  9. 10.1080/08276331.2013.803672 · DOI
  10. De Stefano V, 2016, Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal, 37, 461
  11. Esping-Andersen G, 1990, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
  12. 10.1355/9789814786003-021 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0022185619839428 · DOI
  14. Foucault M, 1991, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 87
  15. Foucault M, 2008, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979
  16. Foucault M, 2009, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-1978
  17. 10.1111/awr.12187 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gordon C, 1991, The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, 1
  20. 10.1080/00472336.2018.1429007 · DOI
  21. Hadiz VR, 1997, Workers and the State in New Order Indonesia
  22. 10.1108/ER-04-2017-0083 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00490.x · DOI
  24. Herod A, 2016, Neoliberalism, Precarious Work and Remaking the Geography of Global Capitalism, Neoliberal Capitalism and Precarious Work: Ethnographies of Accommodation and Resistance
  25. 10.1111/1467-9248.00279 · DOI
  26. Hsiao HM, 2015, Policy Responses to Precarious Work in Asia
  27. Kalleberg AL, 2018, Precarious Lives: Job Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies
  28. 10.1177/0002764212466238 · DOI
  29. Kalleberg AL, 2015, Policy Responses to Precarious Work in Asia, 1
  30. 10.1080/12265934.2014.992938 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2655287 · DOI
  32. 10.1007/s10624-019-09544-7 · DOI
  33. 10.1177/0263276409350283 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1080/14747731.2014.935087 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/03085140120042271 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Li TM, 2007, Anthropologica, 49, 275
  37. 10.1177/0896920511419900 · DOI
  38. 10.2307/1956008 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/14797585.2018.1461357 · DOI
  40. Lorey I, 2015, State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious
  41. 10.1007/978-3-319-30984-2_13 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0022009416658701 · DOI
  43. 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.146223 · DOI
  44. Möhlmann M, 2017, The international conference on information systems (ICIS 2017)
  45. 10.1177/0018726717718918 · DOI
  46. 10.1017/S0147547916000028 · DOI
  47. 10.1163/15685314-04702005 · DOI
  48. 10.1177/0263276408097796 · DOI
  49. O’Day R, 2012, Japanese irregular workers in protest: freeters, precarity and the re-articulation of class
  50. Olssen M, 1999, Michel Foucault: Materialism and Education, 10.5040/9798400685309 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/14747731.2021.1884789 · DOI
  52. Panimbang F, 2020, Resisting Exploitation by Algorithms: Drivers’ Contestation of App-Based Transport in Indonesia
  53. 10.1177/0896920519850266 · DOI
  54. 10.37839/MAR2652-550X3.13 · DOI
  55. 10.4324/9780203086674 · DOI
  56. 10.1080/08935691003625182 · DOI
  57. Robison R, 2009, Indonesia: The Rise of Capital
  58. 10.1525/9780520970632 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Rosser A, 2016, Capitalism and Capitalisms in Asia, 301
  60. 10.4135/9781526402271.n3 · DOI
  61. 10.5040/9780755637089 · DOI
  62. 10.1177/0950017019862954 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1177/0002764212466236 · DOI
  64. Visser J, 2006, Monthly Labour Review, 129, 38
  65. 10.1080/00472336.2015.1007388 · DOI
  66. Woodcock J, 2019, The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction
  67. World Bank (1990) World development report: poverty. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/5973 (accessed 5 April 2021).
  68. Yasih DWP, 2021, Precarious workers in the gig economy: neoliberalism and its discontents in Indonesia

Cited by

See all 38

Metadata

Authors
Yasih, D. W. P.
Affiliations
University of Indonesia (ID)
Corresponding author
Yasih, Diatyka Widya Permata
Venue
Critical Sociology
Published
2022-04-08
Volume
49
Issue
4-5
Pages
847-863
ISSN
  • 0896-9205 (ISSN-L)
  • 1569-1632
OpenAlex
W4226088476
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Critical Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
gig economy, neoliberalism, worker solidarity, collective organization, standard employment relationship, labor movement, Indonesia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Normalizing and Resisting the New Precarity: A Case Study of the Indonesian Gig Economy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/08969205221087130
The paper
Yasih, D. W. P. (2023). Normalizing and Resisting the New Precarity: A Case Study of the Indonesian Gig Economy. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205221087130