Cited by 54Pharmacy and Medical PracticesPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Tablet Splitting and Weight Uniformity of Half-Tablets of 4 Medications in Pharmacy Practice

Tahaineh, Linda M., Gharaibeh, Shadi F.·2012·Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Abstract

Background: Tablet splitting is a common practice for multiple reasons including cost savings; however, it does not necessarily result in weight-uniform half-tablets. Objectives: To determine weight uniformity of half-tablets resulting from splitting 4 products available in the Jordanian market and investigate the effect of tablet characteristics on weight uniformity of half-tablets. Methods: Ten random tablets each of warfarin 5 mg, digoxin 0.25 mg, phenobarbital 30 mg, and prednisolone 5 mg were weighed and split by 6 PharmD students using a knife. The resulting half-tablets were weighed and evaluated for weight uniformity. Other relevant physical characteristics of the 4 products were measured. Results: The average tablet hardness of the sampled tablets ranged from 40.3 N to 68.9 N. Digoxin, phenobarbital, and prednisolone half-tablets failed the weight uniformity test; however, warfarin half-tablets passed. Digoxin, warfarin, and phenobarbital tablets had a score line and warfarin tablets had the deepest score line of 0.81 mm. Conclusion: Splitting warfarin tablets produces weight-uniform half-tablets that may possibly be attributed to the hardness and the presence of a deep score line. Digoxin, phenobarbital, and prednisolone tablet splitting produces highly weight variable half-tablets. This can be of clinical significance in the case of the narrow therapeutic index medication digoxin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0897190012442716

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small tablets with no score line, such as phenobarbital tablets, had poor splitting outcomes in terms of accuracy and percentage content.

    “small tablets with no score line, such as phenobarbital tablets, had poor splitting outcomes in terms of accuracy and percentage content.32”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tahaineh, L. M., & Gharaibeh, S. F.
Affiliations
Jordan University of Science and Technology (JO)
Corresponding author
Tahaineh, Linda M.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2012-04-27
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
471-476
ISSN
  • 0897-1900 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-1937
OpenAlex
W2026879507
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacy Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
tablet splitting, weight uniformity, warfarin, digoxin, phenobarbital, prednisolone, tablet hardness, narrow therapeutic index drugs
MeSH terms
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Anticoagulants, Digoxin, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Compounding, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Jordan, Phenobarbital, Prednisolone, Quality Control, Tablets, Warfarin, Reproducibility of Results, Cost Savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review