Cited by 7Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumIntimate Partner and Family Violence

Alternate Nostril Breathing to Reduce Stress: An Option for Pregnant Women Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence?

Rung, Ottilie, Stauber, Leah, Loescher, Lois J., Pace, Thaddeus W.·2021·Journal of Holistic Nursing

Abstract

Background Stress resulting from intimate partner violence (IPV) on pregnant women causes and sustains poor health and contributes to poor pregnancy and birth outcomes. Appropriate interventions to reduce stress in this population of women are warranted. Objective To present a systematic review and the state of the science of evidence on alternate nostril breathing (ANB) as a holistic intervention for stress reduction for pregnant survivors of IPV, framed by complex adaptive systems theory and psychoneuroimmunology. Data sources Eight databases and reference lists of potential articles. Study eligibility criteria Randomized controlled trials published between January 2013 and July 2019. Participants Adults. Intervention ANB. Study appraisal and synthesis method PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Results ANB is effective in reducing stress, as measured by psychological and biological indicators. Limitations Studies were limited in ethnic and gender diversity, most of the populations being Asian Indian and predominately male. Conclusions Use of ANB as a safe and effective holistic intervention for stress reduction shows promise, but research in pregnant survivors of IPV is limited. Implications Stress reduction benefits may be significant for pregnant survivors of IPV and their fetuses, with minimal risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0898010120983659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 76 · Cited by 7

Authors
Rung, O., Stauber, L., Loescher, L. J., & Pace, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Rung, Ottilie
Venue
Journal of Holistic Nursing
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
393-415
ISSN
  • 0898-0101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5724
OpenAlex
W3122604936
Cited by
7
References
76
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Holistic Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Keywords
alternate nostril breathing, stress reduction, intimate partner violence, pregnant women, holistic intervention, complex adaptive systems theory, psychoneuroimmunology, pregnancy outcomes, fetal outcomes, trauma survivors
MeSH terms
Intimate Partner Violence, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Survivors, Pregnant Women, Pregnant People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review