Patterns of psychoactive medication use in community-dwelling older adults in the US in 2016: a descriptive cross-sectional study
Abstract
Objectives: We aim to quantify any use and long-term use patterns of psychoactive medications and explore differences in use by sociodemographic factors in older adults (60–85 years) using the 2016 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Methods: Prevalence estimates of any use and long-term use were calculated. Chi-square and crude odds ratios were calculated to estimate differences in any use and long-term use of psychoactive medication by sociodemographic characteristics of respondents. Results: Thirty percent of older adults in the US reported any use of psychoactive medications. Long-term use was significantly higher in women (28.3% [95% confidence interval: 26.5, 30.2]), white (27.8 [26.1, 29.7]), presently unmarried (27.5 [25.4, 29.7]), and low-income (30.3 [27.7, 32.9]) subgroups than in men (20.5 [18.4, 22.5]), Black (14.7 [12.3, 17.1]), presently married (22.8 [20.7, 24.9]), and high-income (21.1 [19.1, 23.1]) subgroups, respectively. Discussion: Despite continued risks associated with use, long-term use of psychoactive medications is prevalent in the older adult population in the US. Given the increased complexity of pharmacotherapy regimens in this population, enhanced efforts at improving use of psychoactive medications should be intensified.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High psychotropic usage has also been noted with older adults in the community.
“However, high psychotropic usage has also been noted with older adults in the community [9, 10].”
From Stakeholders' views on the use of psychotropic medication in older people: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Bajracharya, R., & Qato, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- Qato, Danya M.
- Venue
- Journal of Aging and Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-09-22
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 86-100
- ISSN
- 0898-2643 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6887
- OpenAlex
- W3087219813
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Aging and Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- UMB ICTR (1UL1TR003098-01)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- psychotropic drugs, older adults, chronic drug administration, prevalence, sociodemographic disparities, gender differences, racial disparities, marital status, income, medication use patterns, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotropic Drugs, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Prevalence, Odds Ratio, Independent Living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review