Facial recognition and the end of human rights as we know them?
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Surveillance not only engenders a sense of powerlessness in the face of social wrongs, it also heightens perceived external threat, encouraging conformity and dependence on prevailing power structures and thereby undermining the willingness to speak and act in contexts of conflict.
“Surveillance not only engenders a sense of powerlessness in the face of social wrongs, it also heightens perceived external threat, encouraging conformity and dependence on prevailing power structures and thereby undermining the willingness to speak and act in contexts of conflict (Murray, 2024).”
From Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology (2026) · cites this paper as Murray, 2024
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a humanized technology: a reinterpretation of Erich Fromm’ s humanistic peace psychology
Wang, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1646601 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murray, D.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Murray, Daragh
- ORCID
- Murray, Daragh
- Venue
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-05-16
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 145-152
- ISSN
- 0924-0519 (ISSN-L)
- 2214-7357
- OpenAlex
- W4396967227
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 0.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- face recognition, human rights, biometric surveillance, privacy, mass surveillance, civil liberties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
