The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategy or Structure? Capital, Labour and Control
Abstract
The literature on and for management makes increasing use of notions of strategy. Is such an approach compatible with analyses of capitalism as structurally determined? The first part of the paper argues that contradictions within capitalist enterprise both create openings for strategic choice, and entail that no strategy will prove successful. The second part examines, in the context of six distinct managerial functions, the extent to which the control of labour can be regarded as a dominant management strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Market, Hierarchy, and Trust: The Knowledge Economy and the Future of Capitalism
Adler, P. S. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.2.215.10117 · Cited by 1,512
The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory
Adler, P. S. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607080743 · Cited by 212
Rethinking Management and Managerial Work: Capitalism, Control, and Subjectivity
Willmott, H. (1997) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679705001101 · Cited by 157
Marx and Organization Studies Today
Adler, P. (2009) · The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199535231.003.0004 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyman, R.
- Venue
- Work, Employment and Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-55
- ISSN
- 0950-0170 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8722
- OpenAlex
- W2099787875
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
