The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common Property, Collective Action and Community
Abstract
We are interested in explaining why some groups of users of common property are able to resolve their collective action problems by themselves and others not. Our argument is that a group possesses the capacities for a wholly endogenous solution to the degree that it approximates a community of mutually vulnerable actors. For an initial test, we reanalyze the cases studied by Elinor Ostrom in her recent book, Governing the Commons (Ostrom, 1990), in which the central role of community is (we believe) obscured.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coase, R. H. (1960) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466560 · Cited by 18,255
Cited by
A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management
Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor Tomás, S. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03704-150438 · Cited by 1,328
Metadata
- Authors
- Singleton, S., & Taylor, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Theoretical Politics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309-324
- ISSN
- 0951-6298 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3667
- OpenAlex
- W2086666038
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common Property, Collective Action and Community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0951692892004003004
- The paper
- Singleton, S., & Taylor, M. (1992). Common Property, Collective Action and Community. Journal of Theoretical Politics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692892004003004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
