Cited by 44Refrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationAdvanced Control Systems Optimization

Modelling and optimal energy-saving control of automotive air-conditioning and refrigeration systems

Huang, Yanjun, Khajepour, Amir, Bagheri, Farshid, Bahrami, Majid·2017·Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering

Abstract

Air-conditioning and refrigeration systems are extensively adopted in homes, industry and vehicles. An important step in achieving a better performance and a higher energy efficiency for air-conditioning and refrigeration systems is a control-based model and a suitable control strategy. As a result, a dynamic model based on the moving-boundary and lumped-parameter method is developed in this paper. Unlike existing models, the proposed model lumps the effects of the fins into two equivalent parameters without adding any complexity and considers the effect produced by the superheated section of the condenser, resulting in a model that is not only simpler but also more accurate than the existing models. In addition, a model predictive controller is designed on the basis of the proposed model to enhance the energy efficiency of the air-conditioning and refrigeration systems. Simulations and experimental results are presented to demonstrate the accuracy of the model. The experiments show that an energy saving of about 8% can be achieved by using the proposed model predictive controller compared with the conventional on–off controller under the examined scenario. The better performance of the proposed controller requires electrification of the automotive air-conditioning and refrigeration systems so as to eliminate the idling caused by running the air-conditioning and refrigeration systems when a vehicle stops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0954407016636978

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, Y., Khajepour, A., Bagheri, F., & Bahrami, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
Huang, Yanjun
Venue
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering
Published
2016-08-05
Volume
231
Issue
3
Pages
291-309
ISSN
  • 0954-4070 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-2991
OpenAlex
W2313948963
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • UWSpace (University of Waterloo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Keywords
automotive air conditioning, automotive refrigeration, model predictive control, energy efficiency, dynamic modeling, moving boundary method, lumped parameter model, fin effect, on-off control, idling reduction, electrification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review