The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cities through a “gender lens”: a golden “urban age” for women in the global South?
Abstract
Although urban women generally enjoy some advantages over their rural counterparts, a range of gender inequalities and injustices persist in urban areas that constrain their engagement in the labour market and in informal enterprises and inhibit the development of capabilities among younger women. These include unequal access to decent work, human capital acquisition, financial and physical assets, intra-urban mobility, personal safety and security, and representation in formal structures of urban governance. But the nature of these varies for different groups of women, not only on account of poverty status and where they live in the city, but also according to age, household characteristics, degree of engagement in income-generating activities and so on. This paper reviews what we have learnt from the literature on gender and urban development. It discusses disparities in access to education and vocational training and to land and housing ownership through a “gender lens”. It considers service deficiencies and associated time burdens, which limit income generation among women. Violence and gender, and gender divisions in access to different spaces within the city and in engagement in urban politics, are also covered. These factors cast doubt on whether women’s contributions to the prosperity often associated with urbanization are matched by commensurate returns and benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Massey, D. (2007) · Cited by 3,615
World Development Report 2009: reshaping economic geography
Scott, A. J. (2009) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp019 · Cited by 1,313
Who Pays for the Kids?: Gender and the Structures of Constraint
Folbre, N. (1994) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203168295 · Cited by 855
Elson, D., & Pearson, R. (1981) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.1981.6 · Cited by 803
Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint.
Roos, P. A., & Folbre, N. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2076035 · Cited by 783
Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training
Moser, C. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203411940 · Cited by 761 · cited 1×
“Molyneux (1984); also Moser (1993).”
Klasen, S. (2002) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lhf004 · Cited by 761
Gender, Identity and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies
Secor, A. J., & McDowell, L. (2001) · Economic Geography · doi:10.2307/3594076 · Cited by 641
World development report 2007 : development and the next generation
Lundberg, M., McKenzie, D. J., Gauri, V., Murthi, M., Ridao-Cano, C., Jiménez, E., Farès, J., & Sinha, N. (2006) · Cited by 571
Labor Markets as Gendered Institutions: Equality, Efficiency and Empowerment Issues
Elson, D. (1999) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(98)00147-8 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Nallari, A. (2015) · Environment and Urbanization · doi:10.1177/0956247814563514 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Chant, S.
- Venue
- Environment and Urbanization
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-29
- ISSN
- 0956-2478 (ISSN-L)
- 1746-0301
- OpenAlex
- W1970192388
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 47.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cities through a “gender lens”: a golden “urban age” for women in the global South? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0956247813477809
- The paper
- Chant, S. (2013). Cities through a “gender lens”: a golden “urban age” for women in the global South? Environment and Urbanization. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247813477809
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.